2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.03.450997
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral performance requirements for division of labor influence adaptive brain mosaicism in a socially complex ant

Abstract: Brain evolution is hypothesized to be driven by neuroarchitectural requirements for behavioral performance. Assessments of such needs should be informed by the nature of sensory and motor processes underpinning behavior. We developed a novel metric to estimate the relative neuroanatomical investments required to perform tasks varying in sensorimotor and processing demands across polymorphic and polyethic workers of the leafcutter ant Atta cephalotes and quantified brain size and structure to examine their corr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large brains may not be required to generate complex behavior, and brain mosaicism and circuitry-rather than overall size-may be important Rowe, 2007, 2013;Chittka and Niven, 2009;Avarguès-Weber et al, 2018;Logan et al, 2018;Godfrey and Gronenberg, 2019). Computational models (e.g., Feinerman and Traniello, 2016;Reséndiz-Benhumea et al, 2021) and patterns in some ant clades (Muscedere and Traniello, 2012;Riveros et al, 2012;Muratore et al, 2021) suggest that group-level cognition may select for reduced brain size and/or adaptive brain size variation. Moreover, complex systems theory predicts that greater social complexity derives from individual simplicity (Delgado and Solé, 1997), although the neurobiological and behavioral meaning of "simplicity" is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Large brains may not be required to generate complex behavior, and brain mosaicism and circuitry-rather than overall size-may be important Rowe, 2007, 2013;Chittka and Niven, 2009;Avarguès-Weber et al, 2018;Logan et al, 2018;Godfrey and Gronenberg, 2019). Computational models (e.g., Feinerman and Traniello, 2016;Reséndiz-Benhumea et al, 2021) and patterns in some ant clades (Muscedere and Traniello, 2012;Riveros et al, 2012;Muratore et al, 2021) suggest that group-level cognition may select for reduced brain size and/or adaptive brain size variation. Moreover, complex systems theory predicts that greater social complexity derives from individual simplicity (Delgado and Solé, 1997), although the neurobiological and behavioral meaning of "simplicity" is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ants have nevertheless emerged as important models for understanding the role of sociality (Ilies et al, 2015;Kamhi et al, 2016Kamhi et al, , 2019Godfrey and Gronenberg, 2019) and behavioral performance and cognition (Muratore and Traniello, 2020;Muratore et al, 2021) in brain evolution. Analyses of sociality and brain size scaling (e.g., Godfrey and Gronenberg, 2019;Muratore and Traniello, 2020) and information processing through social interaction (e.g., Davidson et al, 2016) can contribute to broadly understanding how social biology may have influenced general aspects of human brain evolution.…”
Section: Human and Ant Sociobiology And Evolutionary Neurobiology: Insights Into Brain Elaboration And Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations