1999
DOI: 10.1159/000006596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral, Morphological and Physiological Correlates of Diurnal and Nocturnal Vision in Selected Wading Bird Species

Abstract: We examined in selected wading bird species if diurnal or nocturnal foraging and the use of visual or tactile feeding strategies could be correlated with retinal structure and function. The selected species were the Yellow-crowned Night Heron (Nycticorax violaceus), a crepuscular and nocturnal forager, the Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias), a mainly crepuscular, but also diurnal and nocturnal feeder, the Roseate Spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja), a mainly crepuscular feeder which forages more at night than during the da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(65 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we conclude that the retinal organization and the pooling of photoreceptors are of more influence. Bourke's parrots have a retina with a cone to rod ratio of 1.2:1 (Table1) that is comparable to values found in earlier studies of birds that are active both during twilight and in daylight (Rojas et al, 1999). The cone to rod ratio of budgerigars is higher, 2.1:1 (Table1), which appears to be typical for diurnal birds (Rojas et al, 1999;McNeil et al, 2005).…”
Section: Receptor Poolingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Instead, we conclude that the retinal organization and the pooling of photoreceptors are of more influence. Bourke's parrots have a retina with a cone to rod ratio of 1.2:1 (Table1) that is comparable to values found in earlier studies of birds that are active both during twilight and in daylight (Rojas et al, 1999). The cone to rod ratio of budgerigars is higher, 2.1:1 (Table1), which appears to be typical for diurnal birds (Rojas et al, 1999;McNeil et al, 2005).…”
Section: Receptor Poolingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The change in our predicted chromatic contrasts when including self-screening was less than 5% even for unusually long cone outer segments of 30μm (cf. Rojas et al, 1999;McNeil et al, 2005;Emond et al, 2006) using an absorption coefficient of 0.035μm −1 (cf. Warrant and Nilsson, 1998).…”
Section: Modelling Chromatic Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the cone outer segments was assumed to be identical between central and peripheral regions, as appears to be the case for other bird species (e.g. Rojas et al, 1999). Nevertheless, the total photon catch of all single cone types in the centre of the visual streak was less than that at the periphery because of the reduced cross sectional area of the oil droplets (mean diameters 1.4, 2, 2 and 2.1·µm for t, c, y and r oil droplets, respectively), despite the reduction in oil droplet pigmentation (which at the periphery reduces the overall photon catch of the outer segment by 30, 47 and 39%, respectively, for the SWS, MWS and LWS single cones).…”
Section: Table·1 Microspectrophotometric Data For Visual Pigments Anmentioning
confidence: 99%