2003
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2003.808892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral modeling of switched-capacitor sigma-delta modulators

Abstract: This paper presents a complete set of blocks implemented in the popular MATLAB SIMULINK environment, which allows designers to perform time-domain behavioral simulations of switched-capacitor (SC) sigma-delta (61) modulators. The proposed set of blocks takes into account most of the SC 61 modulator nonidealities, such as sampling jitter, noise, and operational amplifier parameters (white noise, finite dc gain, finite bandwidth, slew rate and saturation voltages). For each block, a description of the considered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
173
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 368 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
173
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the validity of removing DAC linearization (DEM) in the main DAC, three 3 rd order Ms are simulated using the MATLAB/Simulink ® model [11], [12] under various conditions: one analog feed-forward M [7] as a reference and two digital feed-forward Ms as illustrated in Fig. 6, one with a 4b auxiliary quantizer and the other with a 5b auxiliary quantizer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the validity of removing DAC linearization (DEM) in the main DAC, three 3 rd order Ms are simulated using the MATLAB/Simulink ® model [11], [12] under various conditions: one analog feed-forward M [7] as a reference and two digital feed-forward Ms as illustrated in Fig. 6, one with a 4b auxiliary quantizer and the other with a 5b auxiliary quantizer.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-ideal factors, such as clock jitter, thermal noise, and opamp finite gain, were considered and simulated as shown in Fig. 3(a) [7]. The various parameters of these modules need to be chosen reasonably to simulate the actual circuit conditions effectively.…”
Section: Proposed Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very universal tool and the result of the calculation is value of SNDR (Malcovati et al, 2003). On the other hand, it is not able to differ contribution of particular errors on spurious free dynamic range SFDR…”
Section: Fig 2 the Error Of Defining Snrmentioning
confidence: 99%