Behavioral Inhibition and Developmental Risk: A Dual-Processing Perspective

Abstract

Behavioral inhibition (BI) is an early-appearing temperament characterized by strong reactions to novelty. BI shows a good deal of stability over childhood and significantly increases the risk for later diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (SAD). Despite these general patterns, many children with high BI do not go on to develop clinical, or even subclinical, anxiety problems. Therefore, understanding the cognitive and neural bases of individual differences in developmental risk and resilience is of great importance. The present review is focused on the relation of BI to two types of information processing: automatic (novelty detection, attention biases to threat, and incentive processing) and controlled (attention shifting and inhibitory control). We propose three hypothetical models (Top-Down Model of Control; Risk Potentiation Model of Control; and Overgeneralized Control Model) linking these processes to variability in developmental outcomes for BI children. We argue that early BI is associated with an early bias to quickly and preferentially process information associated with motivationally salient cues. When this bias is strong and stable across development, the risk for SAD is increased. Later in development, children with a history of BI tend to display normative levels of performance on controlled attention tasks, but they demonstrate exaggerated neural responses in order to do so, which may further potentiate risk for anxiety-related problems. We conclude by discussing the reviewed studies with reference to the hypothetical models and make suggestions regarding future research and implications for treatment.

Neurodevelopment and the Origins of Brain Disorders

“…Henderson et al, (2015) focus on pediatric anxiety disorders, emphasizing emerging research that points to dysfunction in specific circuits. In pivoting to current and future strategies for treatment, both behavioral and pharmacological, they emphasize interventions that are similarly targeted to specific circuits.…”

Chronological Prospective of Behavioral Decision Making: A Three Realm Model for Cognitive Processing and Behavior

“…Acquisition of information by focused attention or through overt orienting towards an event or stimuli is decided by the brain based on its relevance for certain reward or punishment. As eloquently discussed by Okon-Singer [12], anxiety and inhibitive behaviour often emerges early in development due to early experience based influence on childhood attentional biases to threat [39,40]. Kessel et al [41] provide crucial evidence in this regard showing that temperamentally inhibited children allocate more attention to aversive cues which is reduced in children who are encouraged and appreciated for positive behaviour.…”

Brain and Behavior – Hypothalamus and Limbic System: The Neurobiology of Emotions

“…What is so fascinating about the amygdala and processing of fear is the same brain region as conserved across all mammals down to the lowest mice and most vertebrates and the experience that we fear the basic root of fear reflex that we have during these experiences of fear that we as humans have is not so different than that of a mouse [26] and so it is allowed us as a feed to advance our understanding of behavior specifically the neuroscience of fear more so that I would argue than almost any other neuroscience of behavior because of its conservation when we see an image that even in its most cursory way reminds us of a fearful stimulus it activates the sensory representation in the eyes and then the first way station in the brain called the thalamus [27].…”