2017
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Heterogeneity in Relation with Brain Functional Networks in Young Children

Abstract: This study aimed to identify distinct behavioral profiles in a population-based sample of 654 4-year-old children and characterize their relationships with brain functional networks using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Young children showed 7 behavioral profiles, including a super healthy behavioral profile with the lowest scores across all Child Behavior CheckList (CBCL) subscales (G1) and other 6 behavioral profiles, respectively with pronounced withdrawal (G2), somatic complaints … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Previous RSFC studies either focused on a limited set of psychopathology dimensions (e.g. internalizing and externalizing) or on diagnostic categories, [26][27][28] and did not examine hierarchy of psychopathology dimensions consistent with the HiTOP model. Among children and adolescents, greater p-factor scores derived from the CBCL were associated with reduced maturation of the default mode network (DMN), although this was driven primary by neurodevelopmental symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Previous RSFC studies either focused on a limited set of psychopathology dimensions (e.g. internalizing and externalizing) or on diagnostic categories, [26][27][28] and did not examine hierarchy of psychopathology dimensions consistent with the HiTOP model. Among children and adolescents, greater p-factor scores derived from the CBCL were associated with reduced maturation of the default mode network (DMN), although this was driven primary by neurodevelopmental symptoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study included four datasets obtained from the Growing Up in Singapore Towards healthy Outcomes (GUSTO) longitudinal birth cohort (Qiu et al, 2017; Wee et al, 2018), the Cognition and Brain Development in Children (CBDC) study (Zhong et al, 2014), the Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics (PING) database (Jernigan et al, 2016, http://ping.chd.ucsd.edu/), and the Brain and Cognition Aging Study (BCAS) (Lee, Archer, Wong, Chen, & Qiu, 2013; Lee, Ratnarajah, Tuan, Chen, & Qiu, 2015). Figure S1 displays a flow chart of the subject selection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many infant neuroimaging studies have revealed the brain growth patterns during 0 and 2 years old (Gilmore et al, 2010;Li et al, 2015Li et al, , 2016, they are largely performed at the population level. Hence, we still lack critical knowledge on the individualized brain organization and development during infancy, which is essential for mapping individual brain characteristics to individual behavior phenotypes (Kanai and Rees, 2011;Mueller et al, 2013;Wee et al, 2018;Girault et al, 2019) and exploring personalized diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders (Orru et al, 2012;Wolfers et al, 2015). As a key solution, infant brain fingerprinting is used to discover reliable and robust individualized brain organization patterns that are capable of accurately distinguishing one individual from others, like fingerprints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%