Behavioral evaluation of eight rat lines selected for high and low anxiety-related responses

Abstract

evaluation of eight rat lines selected for high and low anxiety-related responses" (2013 • Genetic models are powerful tools to help understand anxiety disorders.• In order to determine the extent to which multiple anxiety traits generalize we compared eight genetic lines of rats selected for single high or low emotional responses.• We find many behavioral traits generalize across different animal lines selected for a single trait. a b s t r a c t Anxiety traits can be stable and permanent characteristics of an individual across time that is less susceptible of influences by a particular situation. One way to study trait anxiety in an experimental context is through the use of rat lines, selected according to contrasting phenotypes of fear and anxiety. It is not clear whether the behavioral differences between two contrasting rat lines in one given anxiety test are also present in others paradigms of state anxiety. Here, we examine the extent to which multiple anxiety traits generalize across selected animal lines originally selected for a single anxiety trait. We review the behavioral results available in the literature of eight rat genetic models of trait anxiety -namely Maudsley Reactive and Non-reactive rats, Floripa H and L rats, Tsukuba High and Low Emotional rats, High and Low Anxiety-related rats, High and Low Ultrasonic Vocalization rats, Roman High and Low Avoidance rats, Syracuse High and Low Avoidance rats, and Carioca High and Low Conditioned Freezing rats -across 11 behavioral paradigms of innate anxiety or aversive learning frequently used in the experimental setting. We observed both convergence and divergence of behavioral responses in these selected lines across the 11 paradigms. We find that predisposition for specific anxiety traits will usually be generalized to other anxiety provoking stimuli. However this generalization is not observed across all genetic models indicating some unique trait and state interactions. Genetic models of enhanced-anxiety related responses are beginning to help define how anxiety can manifest differently depending on the underlying traits and the current environmentally induced state. a r t i c l e i n f o

Differential Effect of Unilateral Amygdalar GABA<sub>A</sub> Receptor Agonist Injection on Low- and High-Anxiety Rats

“…Statistical analysis of two groups for others behavioral measures taken from the plus-maze during the first trial was revealed that LA rats were showing higher locomotor and exploration activity, but lower emotionality than HA rats. In support of our findings, it had been shown that rats with less anxious behavor in open field, light-dark test and elevated plus-maze were showing higher locomotor and exploration activity, but lower emotionality compared to more anxious rats [1] [35].…”

“…The underlying mobilization of the organisms' reserves is of adaptive value. In addition to the anxiety as a state, the trait anxiety is observed in humans as stable characteristics of an individual [1] [2]. J.…”

Selection of Laboratory Mice for the High Scores of Logic Task Solutions: The Correlated Changes in Behavior

“…The first suggestion (the complex nature of both-anxiety and cognitive behavior) is indirectly supported by numerous data in which the modulation of animal cognition is achieved by genetic manipulation of numerous genes which belong to different signaling cascades and express in different brain areas [18] thus activating them differentially. The second suggestion is supported by several findings, in which the nonuniformity of anxiety traits was demonstrated [19]. Phenotypically similar anxiety traits, observed in different contexts, could be under the control of different neurotransmitter systems [20].…”

Rodent models in neuroscience research: is it a rat race?

“…The differences described here mostly refer to those reported when comparing the most often used rat (Wistar and Sprague Dawley) and mouse (C57BL/6 and Balb/c) strains. However, studies comparing different mouse (Bohlen et al, 2014; Moy et al, 2008) or rat (Clemens et al, 2014; Gomes et al, 2013) strains have also identified substantial differences within, as well as between, individual species, indicating that the full extent of variation between rats and mice might yet be underappreciated.…”