2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2022.102716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral embedding for continuous user verification in global settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers of [28][29][30] chose other ML classifiers for their models. In study [28], a continuous touch-dynamics authentication method was studied.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Researchers of [28][29][30] chose other ML classifiers for their models. In study [28], a continuous touch-dynamics authentication method was studied.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RF, KNN, gradient boosting classifier (GBC), and linear SVM (L-SVM) classifiers were evaluated with these data. While RF and GBC had similar accuracy, GBC was chosen as the optimal classifier due to a faster performance with an average accuracy under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.9692 and a learning time of 117 s. For [29], researchers attempted to create a privacy-preserving global continuous authentication model using touch dynamics. To achieve this, base features would be extracted from initial user sessions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation