2006
DOI: 10.3398/1527-0904(2006)66[12:baproe]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Eared Grebes (Podiceps Nigricollis) to Variations in Brine Shrimp (Artemia Franciscana) Densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can question our conclusion that brine shrimp are food-limited given predation by corixids (Wurtsbaugh andBerry 1990, Wurtsbaugh 1992) and the abundant Eared Grebes (Caudell and Conover 2006) might limit brine shrimp. However, when corixid and Eared Grebe numbers were correlated with the residuals of the above relationships or were included in the relationships, predator impacts were not negative as expected if it is limiting, but exhibited a weak positive effect for corixids (p , 0.02) and no effect for Eared Grebes (p , 0.24).…”
Section: Brine Shrimpmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can question our conclusion that brine shrimp are food-limited given predation by corixids (Wurtsbaugh andBerry 1990, Wurtsbaugh 1992) and the abundant Eared Grebes (Caudell and Conover 2006) might limit brine shrimp. However, when corixid and Eared Grebe numbers were correlated with the residuals of the above relationships or were included in the relationships, predator impacts were not negative as expected if it is limiting, but exhibited a weak positive effect for corixids (p , 0.02) and no effect for Eared Grebes (p , 0.24).…”
Section: Brine Shrimpmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Jehl (1988Jehl ( , 2007 concluded that Eared Grebe migration from Mono Lake in California was influenced by comparable brine shrimp densities. In contrast, a smaller value of 0.04-1.0/l was estimated to provide basal and foraging energetic needs for Eared Grebes in Great Salt Lake (Caudell 2001, Caudell and Conover 2006, Conover and Caudell 2009), but this does not include the greater demands of migration, survival in the wild, and reproduction. Finally, our estimated minimum brine shrimp density for maintenance of grebe populations (5.85/l) is not much smaller than average observed brine shrimp density during our study (6.97/l), which suggests that grebe numbers may be sensitive to brine shrimp populations.…”
Section: Predatorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Feeding behaviour might also be affected by other factors such as wind speed (Green et al, 1999;Heath et al, 2008), or the time of day when data were recorded (Heath et al, 2008), but in our study all foraging observations were conducted at the same time and on days without wind. In the Great Salt Lake, grebes also increased their time spent foraging when brine shrimp densities were low (Caudell & Conover, 2006b). Our analysis of gizzard contents confirmed the dominance of brine shrimps in the grebe diet at the Odiel marshes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is likely that moulting grebes are only able to adjust foraging effort within certain limits, given the number of daylight hours and the need to spend time in other activities (Caudell & Conover, 2006b). At the end of moulting period when thermal stress is greatest and food supply is lowest in the Odiel marshes, grebes may not be able to meet their energy requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, there is an upper limit to the time that grebes can spend foraging each day, because they must spend a certain amount of time for preening and resting (Caudell and Conover 2006). Most of the feeding occurs during daylight hours (Cooper, Winkler, and Lenz 1984;Fox 1994) because they locate food by sight (Caudell and Conover 2006). Flight exercises marked the end of the wintering period when the assemblage of moulting individuals trained the wings to leave the study site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%