2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and neurochemical interactions between Group 1 mGluR antagonists and ethanol: Potential insight into their anti-addictive properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
168
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
168
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is that glutamatergic transmission in some subregions of the NAc may be more responsive to ethanol challenge than others. For example, studies with probe placements largely, but not exclusively, within the NAc shell suggest this subregion responds to ethanol challenge in a dose-dependent manner (Lominac et al, 2006). Analysis of the present data did not reveal differences in GLU EX levels across NAc subregions following ethanol gavage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possibility is that glutamatergic transmission in some subregions of the NAc may be more responsive to ethanol challenge than others. For example, studies with probe placements largely, but not exclusively, within the NAc shell suggest this subregion responds to ethanol challenge in a dose-dependent manner (Lominac et al, 2006). Analysis of the present data did not reveal differences in GLU EX levels across NAc subregions following ethanol gavage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Although there appeared to be a trend to increase GLU EX at the higher dose (2 g/kg), the lack of a significant response to the ethanol challenge was observed even when differences between the groups in baseline GLU EX levels were taken into account. This was somewhat surprising given that other microdialysis studies in mice and rats have indicated systemic administration of low ethanol doses (0.5-1 g/kg) increase accumbal GLU EX levels (Lominac et al, 2006;Moghaddam and Bolinao, 1994;Selim and Bradberry, 1996;Smith et al, 2004;Szumlinski et al, 2008), whereas higher doses (2 to 3 g/kg) either decrease GLU EX or produce no change (Lominac et al, 2006;Piepponen et al, 2002;Smith et al, 2004;Yan et al, 1998). All of these earlier studies administered ethanol via the intraperitoneal route during dialysis, whereas ethanol was administered by gavage in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, while many drugs of abuse increase corticoaccumbens IEG Homer expression, this drug effect is transient and independent of a particular mechanism of drug action. In contrast to IEG Homers, the regulation of corticoaccumbens CC-Homer expression by drugs of abuse is more complex (Table 2) [39, 157,[166][167][168][169][170] and, as will be discussed below in greater detail, may reflect a compensatory response to either the immediate or longer-term effects of drug administration upon corticoaccumbens glutamate transmission.…”
Section: Homers Are Regulated Within Addiction-related Neural Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose-response function for acute alcohol-induced changes in corticoaccumbens extracellular glutamate is biphasic; lower doses either do not change or increase glutamate levels, while moderate to higher doses reduce glutamate levels [39, 64,168,245]. Repeated alcohol administration alters basal glutamate content in the NAC [e.g., 38, [246][247][248] and sensitizes the capacity of alcohol to elevate extracellular glutamate levels, at least within the NAC [38,39,[249][250][251].…”
Section: Homers and Alcohol-induced Neuroplasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoblotting B6 mice were permitted 24-h free access to water or alcohol (four bottle choice with 0, 3, 6, and 12% alcohol; Lominac et al, 2006) for a period of 3 months. At 2 days, 2 weeks, and 2 months withdrawal from end of the 3-month period of drinking, the entire NAC (shell and core) was dissected out over ice and homogenized in a medium consisting of radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (65 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1.8 mM Na-deoxycholic acid, 1.3 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.01% NP-40, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Complete Mini-tab Protease Inhibitor Cocktail tablet (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany)).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%