2009
DOI: 10.1134/s0032945209010111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and morphological asymmetries in roach Rutilus rutilus (Cyprinidae: Cypriniformes) underyearlings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fsi strain of zebrafish, which show reversed anatomical morphologies of the viscera and brain (diencephalon), showed a lateralization bias opposite that of wild-type individuals in two behavioural tests, i.e., eye use during a mirror test and a target approach test [1]. Individual laterality in behavioural responses is widely observed among many fish (e.g., [2,16,23,29,45,48], but the actual frequency of visceral inversion is very low in wild-type individuals, e.g., in medaka (0.35%, [17]) and zebrafish (from about 5%, [27]). This evidence suggests that brain asymmetries based on visceral inversion cannot explain most cases of individual laterality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fsi strain of zebrafish, which show reversed anatomical morphologies of the viscera and brain (diencephalon), showed a lateralization bias opposite that of wild-type individuals in two behavioural tests, i.e., eye use during a mirror test and a target approach test [1]. Individual laterality in behavioural responses is widely observed among many fish (e.g., [2,16,23,29,45,48], but the actual frequency of visceral inversion is very low in wild-type individuals, e.g., in medaka (0.35%, [17]) and zebrafish (from about 5%, [27]). This evidence suggests that brain asymmetries based on visceral inversion cannot explain most cases of individual laterality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that individual laterality in behavioural responses is observed among many fish (e.g. Bisazza et al, 1997;Heuts, 1999;Izvekov et al, 2009;Reddon and Hurd, 2009;Bisazza and Brown, 2011;Domenici et al, 2014;Ferrari et al, 2015;Besson et al, 2017), appearance pattern and the interspecific difference of behavioural laterality remain contentious matters. Additional investigations into the levels of laterality in species with different feeding habits will improve our understanding of the ecological significance of laterality.…”
Section: ) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%