2000
DOI: 10.1007/s002650000215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and demographic changes following the loss of the breeding female in cooperatively breeding marmosets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…strangers, which would probably be attacked (35). Yet, this prosociality is not merely kin favoritism because marmosets, just like other primates, recognize kin as shown by their ability to avoid inbreeding (36,37) and differentiate between related and nonrelated extragroup individuals (38). Nonetheless, kin selection may well have played a role in the origin of unsolicited prosociality (39), which subsequently was extended to actual and prospective social partners (40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strangers, which would probably be attacked (35). Yet, this prosociality is not merely kin favoritism because marmosets, just like other primates, recognize kin as shown by their ability to avoid inbreeding (36,37) and differentiate between related and nonrelated extragroup individuals (38). Nonetheless, kin selection may well have played a role in the origin of unsolicited prosociality (39), which subsequently was extended to actual and prospective social partners (40).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In captivity, therefore, the presence of a breeding female may constrain other females' likelihood of ovulating and conceiving but, following conception, does not appear to further influence pregnancy, parturition or lactation. A similar pattern may occur in free-living marmosets: numerous subordinate females have been reported to give birth to live infants, and do not appear to be subjected to increased aggression or eviction (Digby 1995a;Lazaro-Perea et al 2000;Arruda et al 2005;Sousa et al 2005). …”
Section: What Are the Causes Of Reduced Reproductive Success In Subormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Typically, only a single dominant male and one or two dominant females breed; the remaining adults and immatures serve as non-reproductive alloparents. Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA analyses of free-ranging groups indicate that mates are unrelated to one another, while in plurally breeding groups the two breeding females are often closely related to each other and to the remaining group members ( Nievergelt et al 2000;Faulkes et al 2003); however, population crashes and periods of instability can result in groups comprising unrelated individuals (Lazaro-Perea et al 2000;Faulkes et al 2003). Marmoset societies are therefore dynamic and unpredictable.…”
Section: Marmoset Social and Breeding Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nearly every territorial encounter, a male from one group and a female from another group would cease behaving aggressively towards each other, move away from the rest of the group and copulate before returning to be aggressive to each other again. When a breeding animal disappeared from a group, the vacancy was filled rapidly, often by an animal previously seen engaged in territorial and assessment behaviour (Lazaro-Perea et al 2000). Scent marks produced by non-reproductive males and females at territory boundaries may provide information about quality (physical health, stamina, reproductive competence) and also individual identity, information that can influence mate choice decisions.…”
Section: The Role Of Social Odours In Marmosets and Tamarinsmentioning
confidence: 99%