1991
DOI: 10.1016/0005-7916(91)90014-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and cognitive treatment methods: A critical comparative review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A very early narrative review of 40 studies that were mostly randomized trials or studies with matched control design (87%) compared behaviour therapy techniques with CT techniques or a combination of both across a large range of mental health disorders and other presenting issues, including depression. 44 The results from these 40 studies showed that in 83% of studies there was no additional benefit of adding cognitive techniques to behavioural approaches. Eight studies were conducted in adults with depression; these included a range of comparisons, and overall showed that CT adds little in terms of treatment effectiveness to BT.…”
Section: Evidence From Studies In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very early narrative review of 40 studies that were mostly randomized trials or studies with matched control design (87%) compared behaviour therapy techniques with CT techniques or a combination of both across a large range of mental health disorders and other presenting issues, including depression. 44 The results from these 40 studies showed that in 83% of studies there was no additional benefit of adding cognitive techniques to behavioural approaches. Eight studies were conducted in adults with depression; these included a range of comparisons, and overall showed that CT adds little in terms of treatment effectiveness to BT.…”
Section: Evidence From Studies In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The component analysis study was not the first study to challenge the cognitive explanation for the documented success of CT. Cognitive therapy for depression has been demonstrated to be an efficacious treatment for depression in multiple clinical trials since the 1980s (DeRubeis, Gel‐fand, Tang, & Simons, 1999; Dobson, 1989; Hollon, Shelton, & Loosen, 1991). However, a number of investigators have questioned whether cognitive interventions, in fact, account for the positive outcome of cognitive therapy (see, e.g., Beidel & Turner, 1986; Latimer & Sweet, 1984; Sweet & Louizeaux, 1991; Wilson, Gol‐din, & Charbonneau‐Powis, 1983). The component analysis study highlighted the surprising efficacy of a purely behavioral approach and, from a pragmatic standpoint, raised the question of whether BA, a more parsimonious treatment, would be more amenable to dissemination, particularly via less experienced therapists and/or self‐administered or peer support treatments.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Behavioral Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beidel and Turner (1986) also argued that treatments classified as cognitive-behavioural are no more effective than treatments classified as purely behavioural. Although purely behavioural treatment is uncommon in current clinical practice, the conclusion of equal Emotion-Congruent Information Processing 4 effectiveness remains consistent with more recent evidence on the treatment of depression (Jacobson, Martell, & Dimidjian, 2001) and the anxiety disorders (Feske & Chambless, 1995;Sweet & Loizeaux, 1991;van Blakom et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%