2011
DOI: 10.3141/2230-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Analysis of Choice of Daily Route with Data from Global Positioning System

Abstract: This work develops a methodology for converting data from the Global Positioning System (GPS) into observed routes (routes actually taken) to characterize intraindividual and interindividual variability in route choice and to compare observed and minimum-cost routes. Exploration of observed route choice behavior is crucial because the underlying decision-making process is more complex and dynamic for route choice than for other travel choice dimensions. Furthermore, the difficulties associated with collection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exploration of observed route choice behaviour is crucial because the underlying decision-making process is more complex and dynamic for route choice than for other travel choice dimensions. The difficulties associated with the collection of data on route choice are reflected in the scarcity of studies on observed behaviour and the major simplifications made in traffic assignment models developed for the most common commercial software (Spissu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exploration of observed route choice behaviour is crucial because the underlying decision-making process is more complex and dynamic for route choice than for other travel choice dimensions. The difficulties associated with the collection of data on route choice are reflected in the scarcity of studies on observed behaviour and the major simplifications made in traffic assignment models developed for the most common commercial software (Spissu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we focused the attention on a particular aspect of route choice behavior, known as route-switching. It consists on the fact that users, moving between the same OD pair, do not always use the same route, but change, depending on the level of satisfaction of several elements that are not directly known to the researcher (Abdel-Aty, et al, 1994;Li, et al, 2005;Zhu and Levinson, 2010;Spissu, et al, 2011). Several studies have shown the particular behavior in relation to the choice of different routes for the same OD trip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Zhu and Levinson (2009) report 67.5% route changers (GPS data for 35 morning commuters and 351 trips in the Twin Cities area), while Levinson e Zhu (2013) observed about 40% (GPS survey, 95 commuters and 657 home to work trips, Twin Cities area). Spissu et al (2011), based on a GPS survey in the metropolitan area of Cagliari (Italy, all purpose, 12 users and 293 trips) observed 7% route changers, while Arifin and Axhausen (2011) found that 34.5% of users change routes (Jakarta, 93 users, 601 trips, 212 of which by car and 195 by bike, collected with GPS). Thus, clearly there is substantial variability which depends on both the context in which data are collected and on trip characteristics, as well as on the users themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the research of Li et al (2013), route choice behavior changes relating to the familiarity to OD pairs while Hoogendoorn-Lanser et al (2005) focused on overlap in multimodal transport networks using the path size modeling. Knorring et al (2005) had an empirical analysis of long-haul truck drivers, with the result showing that time is a significant factor in the decision-making process and Spissu et al (2011) proved that higher levels of intra-individual variability were found for discretionary trips, whereas higher levels of inter-individual variability, as well as greater deviation from minimum-cost routes, are associated with work or study trips. Most of the above studies focused on the algorithm to generate alternative routes and to select the optimal one, and drivers' route preference is only considered in the selection step, but not in the generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%