1974
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7894(74)80182-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior therapy and the minority client

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certainly, upon careful review and analysis of the behavioral literature, one may identify a number of potential "problems," in the actual application of behavior therapy with these clients, which would seem to demand systematic study before definitive judgment is made regarding the appropriateness and/or efficacy of behavior therapy as a modality for poor and minority clients. Wilson & Calhoun (1974) and Caldwell-Colbert & Jenkins (1982), for example, have discussed a number of "nonspecific factors" (e.g., therapist and client's adjustment,to the relationship, selfdisclosure, language and communication styles, culturally determined values, and culturally determined views of adaptive and appropriate behavior) which could possibly have crucial impact on the course and outcome of behaviorally oriented therapy with minority populations. That behavioral researchers and therapists have not been stimulated to investigate and address such issues may be due, in part, to a basic failure to distinguish between characteristics theoretically inherent in the modality and its actual application or the therapist who applies it.…”
Section: Behavior Therapy: Myth or Panacea?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly, upon careful review and analysis of the behavioral literature, one may identify a number of potential "problems," in the actual application of behavior therapy with these clients, which would seem to demand systematic study before definitive judgment is made regarding the appropriateness and/or efficacy of behavior therapy as a modality for poor and minority clients. Wilson & Calhoun (1974) and Caldwell-Colbert & Jenkins (1982), for example, have discussed a number of "nonspecific factors" (e.g., therapist and client's adjustment,to the relationship, selfdisclosure, language and communication styles, culturally determined values, and culturally determined views of adaptive and appropriate behavior) which could possibly have crucial impact on the course and outcome of behaviorally oriented therapy with minority populations. That behavioral researchers and therapists have not been stimulated to investigate and address such issues may be due, in part, to a basic failure to distinguish between characteristics theoretically inherent in the modality and its actual application or the therapist who applies it.…”
Section: Behavior Therapy: Myth or Panacea?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussion focuses on cultural and moral issues and procedural difficulties in applying a social learning approach to minority clients (Hayes, 1972;Jackson 1976;Wilson & Calhoun, 1974). Students receive training on how to modify behavioral procedures and techniques to increase their cultural appropriateness and usefulness for minority clients.…”
Section: Traditional Intervention 1: Behavior Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as behavior modification have either been disclaimed (Cobb, 1974) in terms of how they have been used in the past on black clients, or recommended for use only when under the control of black people (Bardo, Bryson, & Cody, 1974). In short, even though behavior modification techniques have been seen as progressive in comparison to psychodynamic ones (F. Harper, 1973;Hayes & Banks, 1972), professionals have been cautioned about using them if they are not familiar with black culture (W. Calhoun & Wilson, 1974).…”
Section: Approach To Helpingmentioning
confidence: 99%