Behavior problems of children.

Anderson, Gladys L.; Anderson, Harold H.

doi:10.1037/10577-025

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…without particular order)", and they sat at a round table which (having no head) avoided any claims of precedence. 54 Even the emperor was no exception. The congress made only one minor concession to him: he was given a "place of honour in front of a great mirror".…”

Section: Ii2 Divine Right Hereditary Claims and The Issue Of Formmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Novelty of the Utrecht Peace Settlement (1713)

Sashalmi¹

2015

C.E.P.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a well-established view in political parlance and in historiography as well which looks at the Peace of Westphalia (1648) as the turning point in international relations, marking the birth of the system of sovereign states in Europe, and of the "classical law of nations". 1 In accordance with this view the term, 'Westphalian order' implies the "sovereignty and equality of states, the religious neutrality of the international order and the balance of power". 2 This interpretation, however, has been seriously and convincingly challenged recently by historians and historians of international law alike. 3 Randall Lesaffer, who belongs to the latter group, laconically states: "The truth is that none of these principles were introduced, or even appear as principles of international relations in the Westphalia Peace Treaties." 4 Modern historiography likewise argues, that the treaties of Muenster and Osnabrück, for there were the two towns in Westphalia where the negotiations were conducted due to the religious division, dealt not with the affairs of Europe but primarily with the affairs of the Empire, and the Westphalian Settlement was made in the spirit of tradition, and not of innovation. 5 Peace was reached not by accepting new principles; on contrary, it was concluded through the revival of old ones which had been partly undermined by the long war. 6 Territorial changes were, for example, justified by quoting hair-splitting dynastic rights, because it was not acceptable to base the transfer of territories on the right of con-* The present scientific contribution is dedicated to the 650 th anniversary of the foundation of the

show abstract

Section: Ii2 Divine Right Hereditary Claims and The Issue Of Formmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Novelty of the Utrecht Peace Settlement (1713)

Sashalmi¹

2015

C.E.P.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Behavior problems of children.

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

The Novelty of the Utrecht Peace Settlement (1713)

The Novelty of the Utrecht Peace Settlement (1713)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About