2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11709-009-0027-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of steel fiber-reinforced high-strength concrete at medium strain rate

Abstract: Impact compression experiments for the steel fiber-reinforced high-strength concrete (SFRHSC) at medium strain rate were conducted using the split Hopkinson press bar (SHPB) testing method. The volume fractions of steel fibers of SFRHSC were between 0 and 3%. The experimental results showed that, when the strain rate increased from threshold value to 90 s -1 , the maximum stress of SFRHSC increased about 30%, the elastic modulus of SFRHSC increased about 50%, and the increase in the peak strain of SFRHSC was 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both normal-strength concrete (Bischoff and Perry 1991;Ross et al 1995) and UHPC (Cavill et al 2006;Jiao et al 2009;Lai and Sun 2009;Zhang et al 2009;Ju et al 2010;Rong et al 2010) show strength increases at high strain rates. This strength increase is customarily quantified using the dynamic increase factor (DIF), the ratio of dynamic failure strength to quasi-static failure strength.…”
Section: Dynamic Compressive Behavior Of Uhpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both normal-strength concrete (Bischoff and Perry 1991;Ross et al 1995) and UHPC (Cavill et al 2006;Jiao et al 2009;Lai and Sun 2009;Zhang et al 2009;Ju et al 2010;Rong et al 2010) show strength increases at high strain rates. This strength increase is customarily quantified using the dynamic increase factor (DIF), the ratio of dynamic failure strength to quasi-static failure strength.…”
Section: Dynamic Compressive Behavior Of Uhpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A central question is whether the strength increase in dynamic tests represents rate-sensitivity of the material or confinement effects due to the test method and specimen. Physical factors for the increase in strength at high strain rates include matrix viscoelasticity (Li and Meng 2003) and reduced time for microcrack propagation (Li and Meng 2003;Jiao et al 2009). The strength of concrete is also affected by the confining pressure, as shown by the Drucker-Prager model (Drucker and Prager 1952), for example.…”
Section: Dynamic Compressive Behavior Of Uhpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that the impact strain of BSFRC is improved by strain rate. This is inconsistent with the strain-rate hardening effect [40], namely, the strain of strain-rate sensitive material will be restrained as the stress increases. This is because BSFRC is heterogeneous and the strain softening effect [41] appears due to the microcracks and pores inside BSFRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mechanical properties of both concrete and limestone have been reported to be loading rate sensitive, with compressive and tensile strengths showing improvements with increasing strain rate [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. In concrete specimens, the number of fragments resulting from specimen fracture increased and the corresponding average fragment size decreased with increasing strain rate [1,5,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%