1966
DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0001387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Square Infilled Frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was assumed in Model C that the sectional area of the central strut was the double of that corresponding to the off-diagonal struts. The separation between the struts in Models B and C was adopted as a fraction of the contact length, z, defined by Stafford Smith, 1966, It must be noted that the models shown in Figure 1 are valid for static analysis because the struts are located in order to represent the diagonal compressive field that develops in the panel. When the structure is subjected to cyclic or dynamic loading, the diagonal struts should change according the direction of the loading.…”
Section: Preliminary Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed in Model C that the sectional area of the central strut was the double of that corresponding to the off-diagonal struts. The separation between the struts in Models B and C was adopted as a fraction of the contact length, z, defined by Stafford Smith, 1966, It must be noted that the models shown in Figure 1 are valid for static analysis because the struts are located in order to represent the diagonal compressive field that develops in the panel. When the structure is subjected to cyclic or dynamic loading, the diagonal struts should change according the direction of the loading.…”
Section: Preliminary Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanic-based macro-modeling approaches are derived based on the observation from experimental test results where the load path within the infill panel mainly follows the diagonal direction [29][30][31]. The idea behind the macro-modeling approach is to replace masonry infills by means of one or more equivalent pin-jointed struts for each panel.…”
Section: Modeling Approaches To Simulate the Presence Of Masonry Infimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single-strut model was originally proposed by Polyakov [42] and implemented by Holmes [32], which proposed to calculate the width of the equivalent strut as 1/3 of the diagonal length. Afterwards, several authors [29][30][31]37,[43][44][45][46][47] proposed more detailed formulations mainly based on the relative infill panel to surrounding frame elastic stiffness λh first introduced by Stafford-Smith [29]. The single-strut model was originally proposed by Polyakov [42] and implemented by Holmes [32], which proposed to calculate the width of the equivalent strut as 1/3 of the diagonal length.…”
Section: Single-strut Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter λ defines the relative stiffness of the RC frame and the infill panel, according to the formulation developed in [17], in which Ec is the concrete elastic modulus, Jp is the moment of inertia of the columns of the surrounding frame and θ is the inclination angle of the panel with respect to the horizontal. The overstrength ratio, i.e.…”
Section: Masonry Infillsmentioning
confidence: 99%