1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf02256138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of reinforced plastics based on polysulfone matrix under impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loading rate was 2.14 MPa/s. The impact tests were carried out with a spring-controlled impact machine which has been described in detail earlier [12]. The tests were performed according to a three-point bending scheme with an impactor speed of 4.0 m/s (impact energy 13.0 J).…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loading rate was 2.14 MPa/s. The impact tests were carried out with a spring-controlled impact machine which has been described in detail earlier [12]. The tests were performed according to a three-point bending scheme with an impactor speed of 4.0 m/s (impact energy 13.0 J).…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSU is frequently used as a modifier for the epoxy matrix for CF reinforced composites [34][35][36]. In the 1990s, CF reinforced PSU was widely considered to be promising in medicine for arthoplastic applications, where composites filled with short [37] or unidirectional [38][39][40] CFs were mainly used in these investigations. In recent years, only few papers related to PSU based CF reinforced composites have appeared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quasi static tests were per formed using a universal testing machine of the Instron type at a low rate impact (at impact rates higher than 1 m/s but lower than 30 m/s [24,25]). This impact machine was a spring impact testing machine [26]. Both measuring complexes involved computer reading and processing of the results; in both com plexes, the same measuring apparatus was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%