2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of post-tensioned dry-stack interlocking masonry walls under out of plane loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wall T3 has one post-tensioned bar in the middle which undergoes 40% of post-tensioning level which is equal to 16.4 kN, and 2 reinforcement bar at the sides with no posttensioning force applied to it. Du/Dc ratio for all wall indicate avgood energy absorption capacity and a good margin of warning after crack and before failure occurs [8] and grouted walls exhibit a higher ability to absorb energy almost four times [9].…”
Section: Fig 9 Mode Of Failure Of Wall T3mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wall T3 has one post-tensioned bar in the middle which undergoes 40% of post-tensioning level which is equal to 16.4 kN, and 2 reinforcement bar at the sides with no posttensioning force applied to it. Du/Dc ratio for all wall indicate avgood energy absorption capacity and a good margin of warning after crack and before failure occurs [8] and grouted walls exhibit a higher ability to absorb energy almost four times [9].…”
Section: Fig 9 Mode Of Failure Of Wall T3mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The application of interlocking blocks with post-tensioning bars created unique behaviour which by using strain compatibility equations it will not give an accurate result, instead empirical formula MATEC Web of Conferences 203, 06023 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820306023 ICCOEE 2018 were used. The wall ultimate load capacity was determined using ACI-318 [9] empirical formulas to determine the stress at ultimate in the post tensioning bar using Equation (1), (2) and (3). The formula given by ACI-318 code to find the stress inbounded tendon are:…”
Section: Ultimate Limit Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[34] et al investigated deflection of interlocking block walls with mortarless joint, notable augmentation in compressive strength , and the deviation was higher. Hesham Sokairge [35] et al examine that the dry-stacked brick wall out of a plane performance. There is no difference in out of plane strength of the interlocking and conventional wall, whereas, the interlocking with post-tensioned grouted walls shows 1.6 times higher concentration than the conventional one.…”
Section: Masonry With Interlocking Mortar Less Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main source of out-of-plane loading for masonry walls are considered as wind and earthquake. Experimental study of reinforced and unreinforced masonry walls subjected to these lateral loading was previously studied (Drysdale and Essawy 1988;Velazquez andEhsani 2000, Uzoegbo 2001;Griffith et al 2004, Safiee et al 2011and Sokairge et al 2017. However, work on masonry interlocking walls under out-ofplane loading has rarely been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the wall capacity decreased by increasing the slenderness of the walls. In another research work by Sokairge et al 2017, dry stack interlocking masonry system was used and tested for out-of-plane loading. It was discussed that this system has some disadvantages like low bending capacity and also interlocking units had to settle down to balance uneven surfaces which could result in low strength and stiffness of the walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%