2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
571
4
50

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,309 publications
(652 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
27
571
4
50
Order By: Relevance
“…Pharmaceutical concentrations in the streams impacted by effluents from WWTPs with trickling filters or trickling filters in parallel with activated sludge resulted in the highest observed in-stream pharmaceutical concentrations. This result is in agreement with previous studies that have determined that trickling filter secondary treatment systems yield larger organic wastewater contaminant concentrations when compared with activated sludge processes (Carbella et al, 2004;Lee and Rasmussen, 2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pharmaceutical concentrations in the streams impacted by effluents from WWTPs with trickling filters or trickling filters in parallel with activated sludge resulted in the highest observed in-stream pharmaceutical concentrations. This result is in agreement with previous studies that have determined that trickling filter secondary treatment systems yield larger organic wastewater contaminant concentrations when compared with activated sludge processes (Carbella et al, 2004;Lee and Rasmussen, 2006).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ashton et al (2004) suggested that most WTWs in England and Wales are likely to be routinely discharging small quantities (ng/L) of pharmaceuticals. A number of other studies have similar findings (Carballa et al, 2004). A study in Sweden found diclofenac at higher concentrations in the effluent than in the influent (Zorita et al, 2009).…”
Section: Wastewater Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, adsorption is expected to be a determining factor during the elimination of estrogens at lower concentrations (from lg/l to ng/l), as reported by previous studies. For instance, Carballa et al (2004) observed a removal of 20% of E2 in the primary treatment of a Spanish STP, whereas in a German STP, EE2 and E2 were eliminated up to 35 and 29%, respectively (Andersen et al 2003). Snyder et al (2007) reported higher adsorption percentages (75, 78 and 85% for E1, EE2 and E2, respectively), on activated carbon.…”
Section: Decolourisation Of a Model Synthetic Dye By Immobilised Laccasementioning
confidence: 99%