1978
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/16.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Organic Sulfur Compounds in Flame Photometric Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Samples of the vapour in the head space of the vials were injected into the chromatograph and the displayed signals were adjusted with the data handling software of the chromatograph until the signals were a linear function of the amount of hydrogen sulfide injected. The displayed signals for the other sulfur compounds were considered to be the same as for hydrogen sulfide, and proportional to their number of sulfur atoms but independent of their chemical structures (18). All glasswares were treated in 1 M HCl and thoroughly rinsed in water before use.…”
Section: Formation Of Voiafile Sulfur Compounds By Whole Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples of the vapour in the head space of the vials were injected into the chromatograph and the displayed signals were adjusted with the data handling software of the chromatograph until the signals were a linear function of the amount of hydrogen sulfide injected. The displayed signals for the other sulfur compounds were considered to be the same as for hydrogen sulfide, and proportional to their number of sulfur atoms but independent of their chemical structures (18). All glasswares were treated in 1 M HCl and thoroughly rinsed in water before use.…”
Section: Formation Of Voiafile Sulfur Compounds By Whole Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples of the vapour in the head space of the vials were injeeted, and the ehromatograph was adjusted until the displayed signals were a linear function of the amount of sulfide in the vials. To determine the eoncentration of sulfide in the vapour of the vials, the eoncentration of sulfide in the liquid phase of the vials were determined with the method of Siegel (23), The displayed signals for the other sulfur compounds were considered to be the same as for hydrogen sulfide, and proportional to their number of sulfur atoms but independent of their chemical structures (17), Ali glasswares were treated in 1 M HCl and thoroughly rinsed in water before use. The syringes were rinsed with 0,1 M phosphoric acid after each injection.…”
Section: Determination Of Voiatiie Suifur Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For any given burner design, the response of the FPD is critically dependent upon the ratio of hydrogen to air or oxygen flow rates, the type and flow rate of carrier gas and the temperature of the detector block [171][172][173][174][175][176]. With this burner and flow configuration interfering emissions from hydrocarbons occur mainly in the oxygen-rich flame regions close to the burner orifice, whereas sulfur and phosphorus emissions occur in the diffuse hydrogen-rich upper portions of the flame.…”
Section: Flame Photometric Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deviations from the predicted detector response are more common with sulfur-containing than phosphorus-containing compounds [171,173]. Deviations from the predicted detector response are more common with sulfur-containing than phosphorus-containing compounds [171,173].…”
Section: Flame Photometric Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%