2004
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.2.322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes in a Pseudomonas putida Biofilm on a Condensate-Forming Surface

Abstract: Listeria monocytogenes has been isolated from condensate-forming surfaces in food processing plants. The objective of this research was to observe the behavior of L. monocytogenes on condensate-covered stainless steel with a Pseudomonas putida biofilm. L. monocytogenes-containing biofilms, either with or without added chicken protein, were incubated in a high humidity chamber at 12 degrees C to allow formation of condensate. Samples were analyzed for attached and unattached L. monocytogenes and total plate cou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidently, bacterial pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes and S. enterica, can be entrapped in multispecies sessile communities formed on such surfaces. In addition, attachment and biofilm formation by these two species have been shown to be influenced by either the natural in situ presence of other species or just their metabolic by-products (8,10,11,24,26,27,29,32,33,37,38,39,46,58,77). For instance, the presence of Staphylococcus xylosus and Pseudomonas fragi affected the numbers of L. monocytogenes biofilm cells on stainless steel (51), while compounds present in Hafnia alvei cell-free culture supernatant inhibited the early stage of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilm formation on the same material (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidently, bacterial pathogens, such as L. monocytogenes and S. enterica, can be entrapped in multispecies sessile communities formed on such surfaces. In addition, attachment and biofilm formation by these two species have been shown to be influenced by either the natural in situ presence of other species or just their metabolic by-products (8,10,11,24,26,27,29,32,33,37,38,39,46,58,77). For instance, the presence of Staphylococcus xylosus and Pseudomonas fragi affected the numbers of L. monocytogenes biofilm cells on stainless steel (51), while compounds present in Hafnia alvei cell-free culture supernatant inhibited the early stage of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis biofilm formation on the same material (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacteria may interact during attachment and in biofilms (3,7,11), and antagonistic interactions during attachment have been observed with bacteria belonging to the Roseobacter clade (20). The primers designed for Roseobacter strain 27-4 did not (5), and the DNA of dead bacteria must therefore be removed or bound to ethidium monoazide (21) before the procedure is used in systems where there is interaction between bacteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acinetobacter calcoaceticus has been shown to promote biofilm formation by the pathogenic bacteria Escherichia coli O157:H7, however the mechanisms involved were not investigated (Habimana et al 2010). Also the food borne pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes is a relatively poor biofilm former , which adhesion and biofilm formation may be induced in multispecies biofilms (Bremer et al 2001;Hassan et al 2004). Given the available literature it is likely that species of Acinetobacter and Rhodococcus may promote biofilm recruitment of each other and other species including pathogenic bacteria and this could be in part due to coaggregation interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%