2014
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Laterally Loaded Piles under Scour Conditions Considering the Stress History of Undrained Soft Clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9) and (10), another parameter (the effective unit weight) after scour should be determined by Eq. (11) as Lin et al (2014) presented…”
Section: Modified Lateral Subgrade Modulus After Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(9) and (10), another parameter (the effective unit weight) after scour should be determined by Eq. (11) as Lin et al (2014) presented…”
Section: Modified Lateral Subgrade Modulus After Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analytical model, the lateral subgrade modulus that was correlated to the undrained shear strength of soft clay was modified to account for the stress history effect after scour. The procedures of the modification are similar to those presented by Lin et al (2014), while the latter work focused on the scour effect on the behavior of laterally loaded piles in soft clay. In general, the present work has been developed on the basis of the previous studies (Gabr et al 1997;Lin et al 2014) to improve the analyses for bridge pile buckling under different scour conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although extensive research efforts have been paid on sour effect on pile lateral responses [6][7][8][9], most of these studies have been largely limited to small-diameter piles, with ignorance of the stress history effect under scour conditions. The response of the laterally loaded pile under scouring is usually analyzed by two simplified approaches (I): simply removing the scour layers without changing the strength and stiffness of the remaining soils [7,8], or (II) solely considering the effects of stress history on the soil strength [10][11][12]. The approach (I) ignores the stress history effect due to scouring, which overestimates the undrained shear strength of the remaining soils (as shown in Figure 1), and Figure 1), and thus leads to a non-conservative estimation of monopile response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%