1984
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1984)110:2(235)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Jointed Ductile Iron Pipelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These pipe segments typically can fail in several ways: excessive bending deformations of the pipe barrel, excessive rotation at a joint, or pullout at a joint (Singhal, 1984). Segmented pipe with somewhat rigid caulking, such as portland cement or lead, cannot tolerate much relative movement before leakage occurs.…”
Section: Segmented Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pipe segments typically can fail in several ways: excessive bending deformations of the pipe barrel, excessive rotation at a joint, or pullout at a joint (Singhal, 1984). Segmented pipe with somewhat rigid caulking, such as portland cement or lead, cannot tolerate much relative movement before leakage occurs.…”
Section: Segmented Pipelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the interaction analysis to be of any practical use, equal importance should be given to adequately defining the strength and deformation properties of the pipelines, their joints and the surrounding soil. Some scholars [23][24][25][26][27][28] consider the jointed pipeline as a continuous pipeline with additional local rotations at the joints. Liu et al [29] provide a mathematical model to estimate the mechanical behaviors of the existing tunnels with bending stiffness and shearing stiffness reduction at the movement joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical-based stochastic ground motion was generated and input to pipe networks to generate stochastic seismic responses. Laboratory or large-scale field tests were supplemented to explore the mechanism of soil-structure interaction under dynamic loading [17][18][19][20]. Wang et al [19] provided a detailed summary on the laboratory and large-scale field tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%