Behavior of in vitro cultured ameboid microglial cells migrating on Müller cell end‐feet in the quail embryo retina

Abstract

Ameboid microglial cells migrate tangentially on the vitreal part of quail embryo retinas by crawling on M€ uller cell end-feet (MCEF) to which they adhere. These microglial cells can be cultured immediately after dissection of the eye and isolation of sheets containing the inner limiting membrane (ILM) covered by a carpet of MCEF (ILM/MCEF sheets), to which the cells remain adhered. Morphological changes of microglial cells cultured on ILM/MCEF sheets for 4 days were characterized in this study. During the first minutes in vitro, lamellipodia-bearing bipolar microglial cells became rounded in shape. From 1 to 24 h in vitro (hiv), microglial cells swept and phagocytosed the MCEF on which they were initially adhered, becoming directly adhered on the ILM. MCEF sweep was dependent on active cell motility, as shown by inhibition of sweep after cytochalasin D treatment. From 24 hiv on, after MCEF phagocytosis, microglial cells became more flattened, increasing the surface area of their adhesion to substrate, and expressed the b1 subunit of integrins on their membrane. Morphological evidence suggested that microglial cells migrated for short distances on ILM/ MCEF sheets, leaving tracks produced by their strong adhesion to the substrate. The simplicity of the isolation method, the immediate availability of cultured microglial cells, and the presence of multiple functional processes (phagocytosis, migration, upregulation of surface molecules, etc.) make cultures of microglial cells on ILM/MCEF sheets a valuable model system for in vitro experimental investigation of microglial cell functions. V V C 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling as Prophylaxis of Macular Pucker Formation in Eyes Undergoing Retinectomy for Severe Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

“…This may lead to a disturbance in migration of glial cells. 34 Glial cells, microglial cells, and astrocytes most probably participate in the formation of the native layer of collagen and may potentially secrete factors stimulating the differentiation and migration of myofibroblasts.…”

Adaptive Müller cell responses to microglial activation mediate neuroprotection and coordinate inflammation in the retina

“…However, in response to photoreceptor degeneration [51,52], light injury [53,54], or aging changes [26], retinal microglia are observed to translocate in the radial direction towards injury areas, including the outer retina. We postulate that Müller cells may play a role in the guidance and facilitation of this migration by the presentation of soluble chemotactic guidance cues [55,56] as well as physical cell-cell interactions in the form of an adhesive scaffold [57]. Interestingly, radial migration of microglia adhering to and guided by Müller cell vertical processes was observed during retinal development [58].…”

Cytokines and Chemokines at the Crossroads of Neuroinflammation, Neurodegeneration, and Neuropathic Pain

“…Ramified microglia sample their environment using long processes. These processes retract on activation, allowing the microglia to migrate to the source of infection [212]. Cultured microglia also have a ramified morphology until activated by, for example, SIV-infected macrophages [213].…”