2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of high-strength concrete interior slab-column connections with openings under seismic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the position of the opening plays a major role in determining the resulting strength and ductility reduction with respect to the maximum positive and negative moment regions [3][4][5][6][7]. It is recommended that RC slabs are designed based on the strip method, despite the lack of existing literature on this topic and the need for further investigations, as inadequate calculations and precise instruction can cause the strip method to underestimate the RC slab's load capacity [8]. Moreover, there is still some unclearness regarding how to determine the opening size that will not affect the slab's allowable load-carrying capacity [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the position of the opening plays a major role in determining the resulting strength and ductility reduction with respect to the maximum positive and negative moment regions [3][4][5][6][7]. It is recommended that RC slabs are designed based on the strip method, despite the lack of existing literature on this topic and the need for further investigations, as inadequate calculations and precise instruction can cause the strip method to underestimate the RC slab's load capacity [8]. Moreover, there is still some unclearness regarding how to determine the opening size that will not affect the slab's allowable load-carrying capacity [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng et al [1]used Concrete-Filled Steel Tube (CFST) and steel plate to improve punching resistance of slabs according to ACI 318-19 [2].Using steel plate increased the value (Vpeak/fc 0.5 ) more than CFST column by 10-25%.Augustinet al [3] concluded that the best value for Vtest/VR.C ratio equal one to resistance punching shear according to Eurocode 2 [4]. Issaet al [5] concluded that ultimate load increased by 10% due to increasing compressive reinforcement ratio per Egyptian code ECP 203-2020 [6].Yousef et al [7] concluded that the . punching shear strength calculated using equations of JSCE-2010 [8] for High Strength Concrete (HSC) specimens were unsafe and for Normal Strength Concrete (NSC) specimens were safe.Ferreiraet al [9] tested flat slabs with unbalanced moments and concluded that Eurocode 2 [4] presented the better results while ACI318-19 [2] and FIB Model Code 2010 [10] showed over conservative results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%