2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of heated damaged reinforced concrete beam-column joints strengthened with FRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth mentioning that the SOLID65 element is distinguished for having the capabilities of cracking, crushing, and plastic deformation in three perpendicu-lar directions. However, in this experimental work, the SOLID65 element's capability of crushing failure has been overlooked because this type of failure was not noticed when the load was applied [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Hence, the simulated models' tensile strains depended only on ultimate failure and emerging of cracking [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is worth mentioning that the SOLID65 element is distinguished for having the capabilities of cracking, crushing, and plastic deformation in three perpendicu-lar directions. However, in this experimental work, the SOLID65 element's capability of crushing failure has been overlooked because this type of failure was not noticed when the load was applied [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Hence, the simulated models' tensile strains depended only on ultimate failure and emerging of cracking [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this experimental work, the SOLID65 element's capability of crushing failure has been overlooked because this type of failure was not noticed when the load was applied [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Hence, the simulated models' tensile strains depended only on ultimate failure and emerging of cracking [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. The used Poisson's ratio for concrete ranges from 0.15 to 0.22 thus a representative value of 0.2 was selected [34].…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the temperatures are shown in figure 8, with the conventional model reaching 958 °C, while the CFRP beam, GFRP beam, and AFRP beam registered temperatures of 953 °C, 939 °C, and 963 °C, respectively. Notably, a substantial temperature difference of approximately 200 °C existed between the core and the top layer of the beam [18]. Nodal temperatures help to establish the thermal boundary conditions for structural analysis, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of how temperature variations influence the structural response.…”
Section: Nodal Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connections between column and beam [1], known as column-beam joints, are critical components of RC (Reinforced Concrete) constructions [2]. Many criteria influence the performance of RC column-beam junctions, including reinforcement details [3], concrete strength [4], and relative stiffness between column and beam [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%