2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2011.5949788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of EMO algorithms on many-objective optimization problems with correlated objectives

Abstract: Recently it has been pointed out in many studies that evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms with Pareto dominance-based fitness evaluation do not work well on many-objective problems with four or more objectives. In this paper, we examine the behavior of well-known and frequentlyused EMO algorithms such as NSGA-II, SPEA2 and MOEA/D on many-objective problems with correlated or dependent objectives. First we show that good results on many-objective 0/1 knapsack problems with randomly genera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have indicated that Pareto based algorithms scale poorly in MaOPs (Britto et al 2013;Britto and Pozo 2012;Ishibuchi et al 2011). The main reason for this is the number of non-dominated solutions which increases greatly with the number of objectives.…”
Section: Many-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have indicated that Pareto based algorithms scale poorly in MaOPs (Britto et al 2013;Britto and Pozo 2012;Ishibuchi et al 2011). The main reason for this is the number of non-dominated solutions which increases greatly with the number of objectives.…”
Section: Many-objective Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature includes studies of pairwise relationships between objectives [2,6,20]. However, analysis techniques such as Kendall correlation [3] only manage to identify global relationships between objectives.…”
Section: Objectives Relationships In Multiobjective Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purshouse and Fleming [5] discussed these techniques in their research into the relationships between objectives in MOPs. Other works that have used some of these techniques include Castro-Gutierrez et al [2] on multiobjective vehicle routing problems, and Ishibuchi et al [6] on many-objective problems with correlated objectives. One limitation of these techniques is that they are most suited to identify only pairwise relationships between objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the ability of local search to find local optima effectively over a relatively small part of the search space, genetic local search algorithms have been shown to be very suitable for solving complex multi-objective optimisation problems. Refer to (Beume et al 2007;Zhang and Li, 2007;Li and Zhang, 2009;Bader and Zitzler, 2011;Ishibuchi et al 2011;etc. ) for some recent multi-objective optimization algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%