Abstract:This study documents the behavior of earnings, abnormal stock returns, analysts' earnings forecasts, and accounting accruals following years in which companies report negative annual earnings. Changes in accounting accruals (earnings minus operating cash flows) frequently are used as proxies for managerial manipulation of earnings numbers. Our evidence indicates that earnings typically increase sharply in the year following a loss. The earnings increases are due to improved operating cash flows, not to account… Show more
“…While other accruals estimation methods have been employed (Ettredge, Toolson, Hall, & Na, 1996), the primary techniques in the literature are the modified Jones model and the Kothari et al (2005) model. More recently, Dechow, Hutton, Kim, and Sloan (2012) developed a new technique to estimate discretionary accruals.…”
JEL classification: C1 D89 G19 M41 Keywords: Earnings management Opacity R 2 Discretionary accruals estimationIn this study, we revisit the link between R 2 (synchronicity) and earnings management (opacity) because of the importance of the ongoing debate on the relation between idiosyncratic risk and earnings management in the finance and accounting literatures. Hutton et al. (J. Financial Economics, 2009) provide evidence of a positive link between opacity and R 2 . They interpret their finding to imply that firms with high R 2 (high synchronicity) have less firm-specific information impounded in their stock price. Our results for this relationship fail to unequivocally support the results reported in Hutton et al. (2009). We show that their results are not only time variant but also not robust to the alternative empirical technique recommended for panel data by Petersen (2009) and alternative estimation of discretionary accruals adjusted for firm performance prescribed by Kothari et al. (2005). We also find no support for a convex relation between idiosyncratic risk and opacity. The findings documented in this study substantially revise some of Hutton et al.'s findings in this important and growing area of research.
“…While other accruals estimation methods have been employed (Ettredge, Toolson, Hall, & Na, 1996), the primary techniques in the literature are the modified Jones model and the Kothari et al (2005) model. More recently, Dechow, Hutton, Kim, and Sloan (2012) developed a new technique to estimate discretionary accruals.…”
JEL classification: C1 D89 G19 M41 Keywords: Earnings management Opacity R 2 Discretionary accruals estimationIn this study, we revisit the link between R 2 (synchronicity) and earnings management (opacity) because of the importance of the ongoing debate on the relation between idiosyncratic risk and earnings management in the finance and accounting literatures. Hutton et al. (J. Financial Economics, 2009) provide evidence of a positive link between opacity and R 2 . They interpret their finding to imply that firms with high R 2 (high synchronicity) have less firm-specific information impounded in their stock price. Our results for this relationship fail to unequivocally support the results reported in Hutton et al. (2009). We show that their results are not only time variant but also not robust to the alternative empirical technique recommended for panel data by Petersen (2009) and alternative estimation of discretionary accruals adjusted for firm performance prescribed by Kothari et al. (2005). We also find no support for a convex relation between idiosyncratic risk and opacity. The findings documented in this study substantially revise some of Hutton et al.'s findings in this important and growing area of research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.