1980
DOI: 10.13182/nt80-a32555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Defective Pressurized Water Reactor Fuel Rods during Power Ramp and Power-Cooling-Mismatch Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction of nuclear fuel with a water coolant is a critical factor in the development of new fuels for light water reactor (LWR) applications. Indeed, in the event of a cladding breach, the interaction of the fuel material with the water-based coolant is inevitable, and can potentially lead to a range of undesirable events, such as the dissolution of U in the coolant, physical pulverization, and “wash-out” of the fuel, and, in an extreme event, contamination of the primary loop with fuel material and fission products, and disruption to the cladding geometry that is ultimately responsible for retaining the thermal hydraulic performance of the core 1 , 2 . Therefore, in addition to assessing its performance under normal operating conditions, an evaluation of an LWR fuel candidate requires an investigation of its behavior in contact with pressurized water at temperatures and pressures typical of the primary loop 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of nuclear fuel with a water coolant is a critical factor in the development of new fuels for light water reactor (LWR) applications. Indeed, in the event of a cladding breach, the interaction of the fuel material with the water-based coolant is inevitable, and can potentially lead to a range of undesirable events, such as the dissolution of U in the coolant, physical pulverization, and “wash-out” of the fuel, and, in an extreme event, contamination of the primary loop with fuel material and fission products, and disruption to the cladding geometry that is ultimately responsible for retaining the thermal hydraulic performance of the core 1 , 2 . Therefore, in addition to assessing its performance under normal operating conditions, an evaluation of an LWR fuel candidate requires an investigation of its behavior in contact with pressurized water at temperatures and pressures typical of the primary loop 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%