2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:2(189)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Beam Columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrated plasticity formulations model material nonlinearity only at hinges, usually of zero length, at the element ends while assuming the element remains elastic in between the hinges (Hajjar and Gourley 1997;El-Tawil and Deierlein 2001;Inai et al 2004). Distributed plasticity formulations allow material nonlinearity throughout the element, monitoring inelasticity at specific integration points along the length of the element (Hajjar et al 1998;Aval et al 2002;Varma et al 2002;Tort and Hajjar 2007).…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrated plasticity formulations model material nonlinearity only at hinges, usually of zero length, at the element ends while assuming the element remains elastic in between the hinges (Hajjar and Gourley 1997;El-Tawil and Deierlein 2001;Inai et al 2004). Distributed plasticity formulations allow material nonlinearity throughout the element, monitoring inelasticity at specific integration points along the length of the element (Hajjar et al 1998;Aval et al 2002;Varma et al 2002;Tort and Hajjar 2007).…”
Section: Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation test [30,31] showed that the residual strength increased with the increase of confining pressure, and it showed a strong sensitivity to confining pressure.…”
Section: Support Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many experimental studies on the behaviour of circular CFST columns, which can be classified as columns subjected to constant eccentricity with increasing moment and axial load (Kilpatrick and Rangan, 1999;Lee et al, 2011;Muciaccia et al, 2011;O'Shea and Bridge, 2000;Portoles et al, 2011Portoles et al, , 2013 and columns subjected to constant axial load and increasing moment with constant axial load (Fujimoto et al, 2004;Inai et al, 2004;Prion and Boehme, 1994). In an eccentrically loaded specimen, axial and flexural deformations will increase as the axial load increases whereas in the second type of test specimen, axial deformation has been exerted upon the column before flexure starts to rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%