2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of CFSTs and CCFSTs under quasi-static axial compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the significant amount of existing research on the axial compressive behavior of CCFT columns, the experimental research on its seismic behavior has been very limited. The limited existing studies [7][8][9]14], have generally confirmed the excellent seismic resistance of circular [8,9] and square CCFTs [7,14]. In this paper, a series of large-scale cantilever column tests are presented, where CFT columns with or without FRP jacketing at the column end were tested under combined constant axial compression and monotonic or cyclic lateral loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the significant amount of existing research on the axial compressive behavior of CCFT columns, the experimental research on its seismic behavior has been very limited. The limited existing studies [7][8][9]14], have generally confirmed the excellent seismic resistance of circular [8,9] and square CCFTs [7,14]. In this paper, a series of large-scale cantilever column tests are presented, where CFT columns with or without FRP jacketing at the column end were tested under combined constant axial compression and monotonic or cyclic lateral loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[7][8][9]) as well as other researchers (e.g. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]) on the effectiveness of FRP confinement in improving the structural behaviour of CFT columns. The authors' group has conducted a systematic study into the axial compressive behavior of FRP-confiend circular CFT columns; this study included several series of tests on cicular glass FRP (GFRP)-confined CFT columns under monotonic axial compression [6] and cyclic axial compression [17], and the development of monotonic and cyclic stress-strain models for the confined concrete in circular CCFT columns [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circular glass FRP confined CFT columns were tested under monotonic axial compression (Mao and Xiao, 2006) and cyclic axial compression (Yu et al, 2014;Teng et al, 2013). However, limited research studies were carried out on the seismic behavior of FRP confined CFT steel columns (Xiao et al, 2005;Qin et al, 2013;Gu et al, 2004;Abdalla et al, 2013), and confirmed that both circular and square FRP confined CFT steel columns demonstrate excellent seismic resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The end confinement also improves the inner concrete performance, especially at the highly stressed end regions (Xiao, 2004;Teng et al, 2012;Mao and Xiao, 2006). The effectiveness of FRP confinement of CFT steel columns was evaluated afterward in many studies (Xiao et al, 2005;Qin et al, 2013;Gu et al, 2004;Tao et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2008;Liu and Lu, 2010;Park et al, 2010;Abdalla et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2011). Circular glass FRP confined CFT columns were tested under monotonic axial compression (Mao and Xiao, 2006) and cyclic axial compression (Yu et al, 2014;Teng et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive studies have been conducted on the static and dynamic analyses, and the fire performance of CFST members [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. For example, Han et al [1], Yu et al [2], Dundu et al [3], Dai et al [4] studied the compressive strength of CFST members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%