2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11029-007-0019-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of CFRP-confined concrete cylinders with a compressive steel reinforcement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tao et al (2004), Fitzwilliam & Bisby (2010) and Bisby & Ranger (2010) tested FRP-confined RC columns with a length/diameter ratio up to 20. Tamuzs et al (2007a) also tested FRP-confined RC columns with a length/diameter ratio of 4, but little slenderness effect existed in these columns as a result of their relatively small slenderness and end conditions. In addition, De Lorenzis et al (2004) and Tamuzs et al (2007b and2008) tested slender FRP-confined concrete columns without steel reinforcement subjected to concentric compression to investigate the solidity of these columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tao et al (2004), Fitzwilliam & Bisby (2010) and Bisby & Ranger (2010) tested FRP-confined RC columns with a length/diameter ratio up to 20. Tamuzs et al (2007a) also tested FRP-confined RC columns with a length/diameter ratio of 4, but little slenderness effect existed in these columns as a result of their relatively small slenderness and end conditions. In addition, De Lorenzis et al (2004) and Tamuzs et al (2007b and2008) tested slender FRP-confined concrete columns without steel reinforcement subjected to concentric compression to investigate the solidity of these columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the experimental side, Tao et al (2004), Fitzwilliam and Bisby (2010) and Bisby and Ranger 2010) tested FRP-confined RC columns with a height-to-diameter ratio up to 20.4. Tamuzs et al (2007a) also tested FRP-confined RC columns with a height-to-diameter ratio of 4, but little slenderness effect existed in these columns as a result of their relatively small slenderness and end conditions. In addition, De Lorenzis et al (2004) and Tamuzs et al (2007bTamuzs et al ( , 2008a tested slender FRP-confined concrete columns without steel reinforcement subjected to concentric compression to investigate the stability of these columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final failure of FRP-confined concrete corresponding to the rupture of FRP is very sudden and explosive because of the linear elastic tensile stress-strain behavior of FRP, thus, relatively high compression strength as well as high ductility are expected for concrete under combined FRP-SR confinement, i.e., in FRP-SR confined concrete. Few tests have been performed to investigate the behavior of concrete confined with both transverse steel reinforcement (TSR) and FRP [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Moreover, most of these tests were conducted to examine the performance of FRP jackets in retrofitting existing reinforced concrete (RC) columns that contained small amounts of TSR, which did not influence the behavior of FRP confined concrete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past two decades, a large number of constitutive models were developed for FRP confined concrete [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. However, most of these confinement models are suitable only for concrete confined in a single material, either internal TSR or outer FRP tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%