SAE Technical Paper Series 1986
DOI: 10.4271/861235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Adhering Fuel on Cold Combustion Chamber Wall in Direct Injection Diesel Engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vaporization results indicate that 90 per cent of the fuel adheres on the wall for the continuous multicomponent model. This is similar to that predicted by Stanton et al [13] but is higher than the experimental study of Tsunemoto et al [8]. It has been shown [46,75] that spray targeting is a strong factor in determining the amount of splashing and fuel adherence to the wall, and the location of impingement was not shown for the study of Tsunemoto et al…”
Section: Cold-start Predictionssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vaporization results indicate that 90 per cent of the fuel adheres on the wall for the continuous multicomponent model. This is similar to that predicted by Stanton et al [13] but is higher than the experimental study of Tsunemoto et al [8]. It has been shown [46,75] that spray targeting is a strong factor in determining the amount of splashing and fuel adherence to the wall, and the location of impingement was not shown for the study of Tsunemoto et al…”
Section: Cold-start Predictionssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Wall impingement of the spray was found to adversely affect startability, since the film temperature is dominated by the wall temperature in the absence of high swirl, and little vaporization of the film occurs. Tsunemoto et al [8] showed that 30±40 per cent of the fuel adhered to the wall. This amount increased with reduction in the cranking speed, approximately 7 per cent per 100 r=min, and was also sensitive to the wall temperature and amount of fuel injected.…”
Section: Jer00799´# 2000´imechementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that, with decreasing compression ratio, the startability of the diesel engine became worse and the peak pressure of the cylinder and the smoke emissions decreased. Tsunemoto et al 9 found that, at low compression ratios, the cylinder pressure and the temperature of the start-up process decreased and the start-up performance was poor. It was found that 30–40% of the injected fuel remained on the combustion chamber wall after being burned at low compression ratios under low-temperature conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsunemoto, et al [13], studied the influence of combustion chamber shape and depth on the adhering fuel to the chamber walls in a direct injection diesel engine. They concluded that, in shallow combustion chambers, the distance from injection nozzle to the combustion chamber wall with bowl and cavities is far, and fuel evaporates before impinging on the wall reducing the amount of remaining fuel.…”
Section: Chamber Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors , such as ambient temperature and pressure [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10]11], the combustion chamber design [11,12,13], the fuel properties [14,15,16], the injection process [1,6,7,17], cranking speed [6,7,11,17], residuals composition, equivalence ratio, surface temperature and the inlet charge temperature [ 14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40], affect the combustion process and engine-out emissions.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Cold Startmentioning
confidence: 99%