Post-tensioned (PT) self-centering moment frames were developed as an alternative to welded momentresisting frames (MRFs). Lateral deformation of a PT frame opens gaps between beams and columns. The use of a composite slab in welded MRFs limits the opening of gaps at the beam-to-column interfaces but cannot be adopted in PT self-centering frames. In this study, a sliding slab is used to minimize restraints to the expansion of the PT frame. A composite slab is rigidly connected to the beams in a single bay of the PT frame. A sliding device is installed between the floor beams and the beams in other bays, wherever the slab is allowed to slide. Many shaking table tests were conducted on a reduced-scale, two-by-two bay one-story specimen, which comprised one PT frame and two gravitational frames (GFs). The PT frame and GFs were self-centering throughout the tests, responding in phase with only minor differences in peak drifts that were caused by the expansion of the PT frame. When the specimen was excited by the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake with a peak ground acceleration of 1.87g, the maximum interstory drift was 7.2% and the maximum lateral force was 270 kN, equal to 2.2 times the yield force of the specimen. Buckling of the beam bottom flange was observed near the column face, and the initial post-tensioning force in the columns and beams decreased by 50 and 22%, respectively. However, the specimen remained self-centering and its residual drift was 0.01%. Figure 1. (a) PT connection and (b) flag-shaped hysteretic behavior.of an MRF with PT connections exceeds the performance of an MRF with typical welded connections [12,13].Although the newly developed PT connection provides satisfactory cyclic performance, Kim and Christopoulos [13] and Garlock et al. [14,15] raised the issue of how columns and slabs restrainted PT frame expansion. Gap opening at the beam-to-column interfaces causes an expansion of the PT frame. The column and slab restraints that oppose the frame expansion affect the compression force in the PT beam. Kim and Christopoulos [13] suggested an approximate approach to estimate the restraint, which is appropriate in cases where a more concentrated response occurs at a single floor alone and overly conservative in cases where the structure responds in its fundamental mode. For a PT frame that responds in its fundamental mode, Chou and Chen [16] proposed a method for evaluating the restraint that considered the continuity and boundary conditions of the column. The method requires a structural analysis of the column in a deformed configuration and equations that are derived from the compatibility of deformation of beams, strands, and columns.When gaps open at the beam-to-column interfaces, the concrete slab, if it does not open near the columns, restrains frame expansion, affecting the self-centering [17]. Garlock et al. [14,15] and King [10] suggested that the collector beams or bays transfer the inertial force into the PT frame and accommodate PT frame expansion. Kim and Christopoulos [13] proposed detail...