1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02956070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behandlung und kontrolle primärer kardiovaskulärer risikofaktoren in den alten bundesländern

Abstract: From February 1990 until late October 1991, M. xenopi was isolated from the sputa of 30 persons in one of the 4 boroughs of Ostrava. This species could also be identified in water samples and smears taken in 7 out of 14 tested households of both colonized persons and patients with mycobacteriosis xenopi. As established, the optimum conditions for multiplication of M. xenopi exist in exchanger units; control measures for this agent in the exchanger facilities are proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A long period from infection and colonization to disease development may also affect differences in the genetic profile of the NTM isolates from patients compared to those from the environment [81]. Despite these difficulties, a study by Kaustova et al (1993) showed a connection between M. xenopi human isolates and contaminated household water in the Ostrava district in a study covering the period 1990–1991 [84].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A long period from infection and colonization to disease development may also affect differences in the genetic profile of the NTM isolates from patients compared to those from the environment [81]. Despite these difficulties, a study by Kaustova et al (1993) showed a connection between M. xenopi human isolates and contaminated household water in the Ostrava district in a study covering the period 1990–1991 [84].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, there is a wide range, e.g. up to 65.7% of the actual prevalence, controlled in different studies with larger populations between N = 2,992 and N = 26,913 (Haijar and Kotchen 2003;Jo et al 2001;Laaser et al 1993;Leenen et al 2008;Macedo et al 2005;Meisinger et al 2006;Psaltopoulou et al 2004;Wang et al 2004). In the majority of these studies, control rates between 10 and 20% were found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%