1984
DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(84)90028-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beef quality assessed at European research centres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the correlation between juiciness and texture is higher than with flavour scores given that juiciness depends mainly on the meat water-binding capacity and plays a key role in meat texture [38-40], contributing to its variability [41], whereas flavour is mainly influenced by FA composition and marbling [42], as reflected by its positive correlations with all absolute fat content measurements obtained here (Table 2). Although texture and juiciness properties also are dependent on other characteristics of meat, including fat content [40], both of them showed few or no correlation with muscle fat content or FA profile (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…As expected, the correlation between juiciness and texture is higher than with flavour scores given that juiciness depends mainly on the meat water-binding capacity and plays a key role in meat texture [38-40], contributing to its variability [41], whereas flavour is mainly influenced by FA composition and marbling [42], as reflected by its positive correlations with all absolute fat content measurements obtained here (Table 2). Although texture and juiciness properties also are dependent on other characteristics of meat, including fat content [40], both of them showed few or no correlation with muscle fat content or FA profile (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Also, meat toughness as determined by the consumers was not found to be significant for any of the individual MAP treatments. In contrast, Dransfield et al (1984) postulated that tenderness and juiciness were the properties that most influenced meat acceptability. Additionally, samples O 2 5024 and O 2 6024 were significantly (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) correlated to overall acceptability (Table 2).…”
Section: Tenderness Juiciness and Flavourmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The structural integrity of myofibrils changes during postmortem aging, which contributes to the tenderness of aged meat (Dransfield et al, 1984;Takahashi, 1996). While the IMCT contribution to meat texture is certainly important, it has been thought to be rather immutable compared to myofibrils during postmortem aging of meat.…”
Section: Structural Changes In Imct During Postmortem Aging Of Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a consumer standpoint, texture is the most important factor in determining the quality of meat (Dransfield et al, 1984). Meat texture depends on the structure and composition of skeletal muscle, which is mainly composed of muscle fibers and surrounding intramuscular connective tissues (IMCTs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%