2006
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-99.2.408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bee Population Returns and Cherry Yields in an Orchard Pollinated with <I>Osmia lignaria</I> (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae)

Abstract: During 1998-2003, we used populations of the solitary bee Osmia lignaria Say to pollinate a commercial sweet cherry orchard in northern Utah. Bee densities released each year ranged from 1290 to 1857 females/ha, with approximately twice as many males. Female progeny produced each year were greater than parental populations released, except in 2003, when nesting was poor due to bird predation. Despite poor weather during bloom, and in contrast to most other local producers, the study orchard produced harvestabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While domesticated honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) are traditionally thought of as the economically most important pollinator in crop monocultures, recent research indicates that wild bee pollinator species can be equally important (Garibaldi et al 2013). Solitary bees are able to provide pollination services in certain crops with similar or sometimes superior level of efficiency (Bosch et al 2006). In this regard, it has been shown that they can replace honey bees (Winfree et al 2007) or act synergistically with them (Garibaldi et al 2013; Brittain et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While domesticated honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) are traditionally thought of as the economically most important pollinator in crop monocultures, recent research indicates that wild bee pollinator species can be equally important (Garibaldi et al 2013). Solitary bees are able to provide pollination services in certain crops with similar or sometimes superior level of efficiency (Bosch et al 2006). In this regard, it has been shown that they can replace honey bees (Winfree et al 2007) or act synergistically with them (Garibaldi et al 2013; Brittain et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, solitary bee visitation in sweet cherry was dominated by Andrena species (96.3% of all solitary bee records). Comparison of solitary bee visitation rates with other studies where managed Osmia (Bosch et al, 2006;Eeraerts, Vanderhaegen, et al, 2020) or wild Lasioglossum Curtis (Abrol, 2005) were predominant may show a different behaviour for this group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In recent years, this has driven research on sweet cherry pollination and the associated pollinating insects. After much focus on honeybees, some studies have compared fruit set and yield achieved by using alternative managed pollinators, including bumblebees such as the buff-tailed bumblebee (Bombus terrestris L.) (Kwack et al, 2012;Sergeevna, 2018) or solitary bees including Osmia lignaria Say (Bosch & Kemp, 1999;Bosch et al, 2006) and O. bicornis (L.) (Ryder et al, 2020). These different groups of managed pollinators showed higher efficiency than honeybees leading to greater yields, except for Kwack et al (2012) where fruit set was similar and Ryder et al (2020) where solitary bees were investigated to supplement wild bees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, improved rearing and management methods of bumblebees and a few species of solitary bees have been developed (Van den Eijnde et al 1990;Bosch, Kemp, & Peterson 2000;Gruber et al 2011;Pitts-Singer & Cane 2011). The most numerous species come from Osmia genus and are mostly managed for fruit tree pollination , 2002Bosch, Kemp & Trostle 2006;Gruber et al 2011). The red mason bee (Osmia rufa L.) is a univoltine and polylectic bee species, common in Central Europe, which accepts diverse pre-existing cavities for nesting (Tasei 1973;Westerich 1989;Ivanov 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%