2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-010-9262-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bee diversity in a fragmented landscape of the Mexican neotropic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Fragment size effects on species diversity, percentage of Centris , and parasitism rate Contrary to our expectations, fragment size had no effect on bee diversity. Previous studies in tropical systems relating bee diversity to size have revealed variable results, some showing an increase in diversity with size (Chacoff and Aizen 2005;Brosi 2009;Meneses Calvillo et al 2010) and others finding no relationships between fragment size and diversity (Brosi et al 2007b;Gazola and Garófalo 2009). This variability could be due to many factors, since little is known about the nesting behavior of bees in tropical forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragment size effects on species diversity, percentage of Centris , and parasitism rate Contrary to our expectations, fragment size had no effect on bee diversity. Previous studies in tropical systems relating bee diversity to size have revealed variable results, some showing an increase in diversity with size (Chacoff and Aizen 2005;Brosi 2009;Meneses Calvillo et al 2010) and others finding no relationships between fragment size and diversity (Brosi et al 2007b;Gazola and Garófalo 2009). This variability could be due to many factors, since little is known about the nesting behavior of bees in tropical forests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Gotelli and Colwell (2010) observed, lack of independence between samples can be neglected if rarefaction curves are functions of the number of samples. Comparison of species richness with unequal sampling effort, which incorporates sample-based rarefaction curves, is often used (Calvillo et al, 2010;Banaszak-Cibicka and Żmihorski, 2012;Żmihorski et al, 2013). To estimate the true species number, we applied 2 estimators: Chao2 (Chao, 1984) and Jackknife2 (Burnham and Overton, 1979).…”
Section: Banaszak and Dochkova 30mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ours is the first study that reports on Australian stingless bees and the effects of tropical fragmentation, it follows a number of studies from other tropical regions. In a study of tropical forest fragments in Mexico, Calvillo et al (2010) found no effect of suggest that dispersal of the species may benefit from forest fragmentation and degradation. These studies, and our own, highlight the diverse responses of stingless bee species to habitat fragmentation and also the regional differences found throughout the tropics.…”
Section: Reduced Abundance Of Tetragonula Carbonaria In Small Fragmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) are the most important pollinator group globally. Empirical studies on the effects of habitat fragmentation on bees are historically uncommon (Cane, 2001), and even with a rise in interest in this topic over recent years, most studies that have been conducted focus on the neotropics (e.g., Aizen & Feinsinger, 1994;Brosi, Daily, Shih, Oviedo, & Duran, 2008;Calvillo, Ramirez, Parra-Tabla, & Navarro, 2010;Ferreira et al, 2015;Powell & Powell, 1987;Tonhasca Jr, Blackmer, & Albuquerque, 2002). While these studies have had mixed results, including both negative (e.g., Aizen & Feinsinger, 1994;Calvillo et al, 2010) and neutral (e.g., Tonhasca Jr et al, 2002) effects of fragmentation on bee diversity, they all tend to show that different bee groups respond differently to fragmentation, probably as a result of distinct nesting and foraging traits among species (Brosi et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%