2011
DOI: 10.2310/8000.2011.110482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bedside ultrasonography detects significant femoral vessel overlap: implications for central venous cannulation

Abstract: Objective: Our goal was to gain a better understanding of the femoral vessel anatomy as it relates to central venous cannulation. The primary objective of this study was to use bedside ultrasonography to determine the amount of exposed femoral vein at three sites corresponding to surface anatomy of the landmark-based procedure. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled a random sample of 180 adult patients presenting to a large urban academic emergency department. Subjects underwent standardized ultrasonogr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These landmark techniques cannot account for anatomic variations at the CVC insertion site. Anatomic variations to the "normal anatomy", however, have been described in a relevant proportion of patients for the internal jugular vein (IJV), the subclavian vein (SV), and the femoral vein (FV) [ 3 11 ]. In addition to anatomic variations, venous thrombosis that is especially common in oncologic and critically ill patients can make CVC placement impossible or dangerous for the patient [ 9 ].…”
Section: Rationale For Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Placmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These landmark techniques cannot account for anatomic variations at the CVC insertion site. Anatomic variations to the "normal anatomy", however, have been described in a relevant proportion of patients for the internal jugular vein (IJV), the subclavian vein (SV), and the femoral vein (FV) [ 3 11 ]. In addition to anatomic variations, venous thrombosis that is especially common in oncologic and critically ill patients can make CVC placement impossible or dangerous for the patient [ 9 ].…”
Section: Rationale For Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Placmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through technical advances and improvements of image quality, RTUS allows identification of vessel localisation the best target vessel and optimised puncture site (10). Anatomical variations can be easily identified (1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and vein thrombosis excluded which is not only of importance in oncological patients (11,12). It is important to exclude vein catheter associated thrombosis in, for example, critical care patients.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17) MHz, in practice 7-12 MHz) linear transducers with a relatively small aperture of less than 4-6 cm are recommended for superficial locations. In deeper locations (e.g., femoral vessels), particularly in obese or oedematous patients, the use of a curved array abdominal probe may be necessary.…”
Section: Which Transducer?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The variability of the vessels in terms of overlap is less well characterised, however existing studies confirm the tendency of the artery to overlap the vein as the vessels progress distally from the inguinal ligament, and that optimum access to the individual femoral vessels is best achieved more proximally, towards the inguinal ligament. [20][21][22] Ultrasound-guided cannulation is superior in terms of accuracy and the prevention of complications, and implementation of an ultrasound-guided approach for femoral arterial cannulation is preferable where resources permit. Active point-of-care ultrasound systems are already in use in the pre-hospital environment in the context of focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST), the detection of traumatic pneumothorax, and, more recently, by the London Air Ambulance for common femoral arterial cannulation in REBOA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%