“…The general reliability of the outlined methodology was validated using a freely available MBES data set from Rio Paraná, Argentina, which was originally investigated by Parsons et al ., (2005). After detecting prevailing bedforms along a total of 150 longitudinal transects from a single (snapshot) bathymetry, dune dimensions and abundances were compared to results obtained from an analysis in accordance with the wavelet analysis tool developed by Gutierrez et al ., (2018) and those published in Cisneros et al ., (2020). Especially regarding the results of the former, the examination of this independent study area reveals good resemblance between the proposed and at least one established approach, except for the occurrence of outlying ‘high small dunes’ and ‘low large or very large dunes’, respectively, which are deemed critical by the authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Unlike other dune tracking tools (e.g. Gutierrez et al ., 2018; van der Mark and Blom, 2007), the algorithm employed in this study does not evaluate BEPs that are detrended or filtered in any way. In order to make allowance for the underlying, complex character of compound dunes in the focus area, it is instead based on an iterative identification of local extremes spaced in accordance with a widely accepted classification scheme proposed by (Ashley et al ., 1990).…”
“…The general reliability of the outlined methodology was validated using a freely available MBES data set from Rio Paraná, Argentina, which was originally investigated by Parsons et al ., (2005). After detecting prevailing bedforms along a total of 150 longitudinal transects from a single (snapshot) bathymetry, dune dimensions and abundances were compared to results obtained from an analysis in accordance with the wavelet analysis tool developed by Gutierrez et al ., (2018) and those published in Cisneros et al ., (2020). Especially regarding the results of the former, the examination of this independent study area reveals good resemblance between the proposed and at least one established approach, except for the occurrence of outlying ‘high small dunes’ and ‘low large or very large dunes’, respectively, which are deemed critical by the authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Unlike other dune tracking tools (e.g. Gutierrez et al ., 2018; van der Mark and Blom, 2007), the algorithm employed in this study does not evaluate BEPs that are detrended or filtered in any way. In order to make allowance for the underlying, complex character of compound dunes in the focus area, it is instead based on an iterative identification of local extremes spaced in accordance with a widely accepted classification scheme proposed by (Ashley et al ., 1990).…”
“…We believe that the Bedforms‐ATM platform of Gutierrez et al . (2018) could potentially be used to build such code. Bedforms‐ATM is currently written in Matlab.…”
Section: Towards Bed Form Data Analysis Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some progress has been made in this respect: some researchers are starting to share their data, encouraged by the requirements from some funding agencies and scientific journals to make data openly available; many data publishers and repositories are being established; and freely available software for bed form analysis is being developed. For example, Bradley and Venditti (2017) have compiled flow and dune dimension data for bed forms in unidirectional flows, and have made the data available as supplementary material; researchers have published nearly 400 000 datasets to date through the data publisher PANGAEA, including 125 related to bed forms; Gutierrez et al (2018) provided technical details of the free access software named Bedforms-ATM (Bedforms Analysis Toolkit for Multiscale Modeling), which proposes standardizing the scale-based discrimination and dimensionality quantification of natural bed forms in a single platform and whose structure encourages its expandability via collaboration from the community of users. The use of Bedforms-ATM to conduct scientific research has been reported by Lefebvre (2019).…”
“…The crest and trough positions of the large bedforms are determined semiautomatically. First, the 400 transects from the 0.5‐m resolution bathymetry are analyzed using the Bedforms‐ATM toolbox (Gutierrez et al, ). The results of this analysis showed that the dominant wavelength of the large bedforms is 60 m. Subsequently, a zero‐crossing technique similar to the dune tracking method of Van der Mark and Blom () is used on the filtered morphology of the large bedforms, targeting the dominant bedform length of 60 m (Figure a).…”
Bedforms are ubiquitous features in rivers and shallow seas, as mobile sediment is transported by flowing water. The mutual interaction of hydrodynamics and bedform has been widely studied in the laboratory over two‐dimensional bedforms having an angle‐of‐repose (30°) lee side and a relatively simple shape. However, the influence of bedform natural morphology and three‐dimensionality on the flow is still poorly constrained. The present work looks at how a natural three‐dimensional (3‐D) bedform field influences flow properties through high‐resolution numerical modeling. A 3‐D numerical model is set up with Delft3D and verified against lab experiments of idealized 3‐D bedforms. The model is used to simulate water velocities, turbulence, water levels, and bed shear stress above a natural bedform field from the Río Paraná (Argentina). The presence and size of the flow separation zone and turbulent wake depend on the presence and properties of the slip face (defined here as the portion of the lee side with angles >15°) and not on those of the crest. When present, the flow separation and wake lengths are, for the tested settings, respectively, around 5 and 13 times the slip face height. A slip face orientation of 25° or more compared to the flow increases cross‐stream flow and suppresses flow reversal over the slip face. To understand and predict flow and bedform properties, the slip face rather than the crest position should be identified and analyzed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.