2001
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-14791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bedeutung der Familienanamnese beim Zervixkarzinom

Abstract: The correlation of HPV-associated neoplasms in affected families suggest a role of mild or moderate hereditary immunosuppression in explaining a part of familial predisposition to cervical cancer are biologically founded. Consequently, this would not imply germ line mutations in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes but in genes modulating immune response and perhaps causing susceptibility to a variety of viral infections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Almost one third of the patients had at least one first‐degree relative with cancer at any site, which should be compared with the results from another study of patients with cervical cancer where only 15–20% of the cases had at least one first‐degree relative with malignancies at any site ( 46 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost one third of the patients had at least one first‐degree relative with cancer at any site, which should be compared with the results from another study of patients with cervical cancer where only 15–20% of the cases had at least one first‐degree relative with malignancies at any site ( 46 ) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported figures on familial cervical cancer in situ (CIS) and cervical cancer are summarized in Table 1. Apart from three studies (the study by Brinton et al [18], who investigated the family history of women with cervical cancer in a North American population, the study by Fischer et al [19] in a German population and Furgyik et al [20] in a Swedish population), all other available studies used the Swedish national cancer registers. Not surprisingly the results of the Swedish studies are similar, although different methods to investigate familial risks were used and results were expressed in different types of risk units [12-14,21,22].…”
Section: Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%