2009
DOI: 10.3189/172756409789097559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bed properties and hydrological conditions underneath McCall Glacier, Alaska, USA

Abstract: During three summer field seasons (2003, 2005 and 2006) we carried out radio-echo sounding measurements with a 5 MHz (central frequency) ice-penetrating radar on McCall Glacier, Arctic Alaska, USA, along the central flowline and 17 cross-profiles. Two-way travel time was, after migration, converted to ice thickness, which, in combination with a recent digital elevation model of the surface of the glaciated area, resulted in a detailed map of the bed topography. This reveals a complex basal topography in the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, certainly in polythermal glaciers, subglacial drainage structures do exist and observations of nontemperate glacier dynamics showed seasonal and subseasonal variations in ice velocities not dissimilar to those recorded at temperate glaciers [ Andreason , 1985; Blatter and Kappenberger , 1988; Iken , 1972; Müller and Iken , 1973; Rabus and Echelmeyer , 1997]; such velocities necessitate the presence of subglacial water and suggest that it is incorrect to assume a reduced surface‐subsurface hydraulic coupling in polythermal glaciers. Moreover, it is likely that at the macroscale, subglacial drainage at polythermal glaciers, particularly those with extensive temperate ice areas, may exhibit similarities with the long‐standing Shrevian model, perhaps forgiving modeling based upon glacier‐scale hydraulic potential [e.g., Copland and Sharp , 2001; Flowers and Clarke , 1999; Hagen et al , 2000; Pälli et al , 2003; Pattyn et al , 2009; Rippin et al , 2003]. However, water delivery to the glacier bed in nontemperate examples may be more spatially discrete than at temperate counterparts, and the controls imposed by spatial variability in mesoscale and microscale thermal regime and water content should not be underestimated.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, certainly in polythermal glaciers, subglacial drainage structures do exist and observations of nontemperate glacier dynamics showed seasonal and subseasonal variations in ice velocities not dissimilar to those recorded at temperate glaciers [ Andreason , 1985; Blatter and Kappenberger , 1988; Iken , 1972; Müller and Iken , 1973; Rabus and Echelmeyer , 1997]; such velocities necessitate the presence of subglacial water and suggest that it is incorrect to assume a reduced surface‐subsurface hydraulic coupling in polythermal glaciers. Moreover, it is likely that at the macroscale, subglacial drainage at polythermal glaciers, particularly those with extensive temperate ice areas, may exhibit similarities with the long‐standing Shrevian model, perhaps forgiving modeling based upon glacier‐scale hydraulic potential [e.g., Copland and Sharp , 2001; Flowers and Clarke , 1999; Hagen et al , 2000; Pälli et al , 2003; Pattyn et al , 2009; Rippin et al , 2003]. However, water delivery to the glacier bed in nontemperate examples may be more spatially discrete than at temperate counterparts, and the controls imposed by spatial variability in mesoscale and microscale thermal regime and water content should not be underestimated.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRP R is the residual BRP, the variations of which are not related to changes in the amount of energy transmitted into the ice (Gades, 1998). In order to obtain BRP est , some authors have used empirical methods, where the measured BRP values from a given area are plotted against ice thickness and a best-fit curve is used as a representative model (usually an exponential fit) (Gades, 1998; Gades and others, 2000; Copland and Sharp, 2001; Pattyn and others, 2009). In contrast, other authors have estimated BRP est theoretically by using the radar equation for which parameters are known (Bentley and others, 1998; Peters and others, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth‐averaged attenuation rates to the bed of polar ice sheets can vary across more than two orders of magnitude (<10 to ∼30 dB km −1 one way) [e.g., Jacobel et al , 2009, 2010; Matsuoka et al , 2010a, 2012], yet the reflectivity difference between dry and wet beds is only 10–15 dB [e.g., Peters et al , 2005]. Furthermore, many studies have assumed a uniform depth‐averaged attenuation rate [e.g., Bentley et al , 1998; Copland and Sharp , 2001; Rippin et al , 2004; Peters et al , 2005; Pattyn et al , 2009; MacGregor et al , 2011; Pettersson et al , 2011]. Although in many cases their inferences regarding basal conditions from radar data are qualitatively consistent with glaciological expectations, this assumption limits both the quality of those inferences and the straightforward detection of regions with basal conditions that do not conform with predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%