Becoming the Leader: Leadership as Material Presence

Abstract

This paper seeks to understand leaders as material presences. Leadership theory has traditionally explored leaders as sites of disembodied traits, characteristics and abilities. Our qualitative, mixed method study suggests that managers charged with the tasks of leadership operate within a very different understanding. Their endogenous or lay theory understands leadership as physical, corporeal and visible, and as something made manifest through leaders' material presence. This theory-inpractice holds that leadership qualities are signified by the leader's physical appearance: the good leader must look the part. Actors consequently work on their own appearance to present an image of themselves as leader. They thus offer a fundamental challenge to dominant exogenous, or academic, theories of leadership.To understand the unspoken assumptions that underpin the lay theory of leadership as material presence, we interrogate it using the new materialist theory of Karen Barad and the object relations theory of Christopher Bollas. This illuminates the lay theory's complexities and sophisticated insights. In academic terms it offers a theory of how sentient and non-sentient actors intra-act and performatively constitute leadership 2 through complex entanglements that enact and circulate organizational and leadership norms. The paper's contribution is thus a theory of leadership micro-dynamics in which the leader is materialised through practices of working on a corporeal self for presentation to both self and others.

Seeing the potentialities at the intersection: A reflection on performativity and processuality mindsets

“…For Pickering (1994), "The performative idiom invites us to think symmetrically about agency: human beings are not the only actors around; the material world acts too" (p. 414). Nyberg's (2009) analysis of the customer call practice as well as Ford, Harding, Gilmore and Richardson's (2017) understanding of leaders as material presence, which are both inspired by Barad's work and question the subject/object divide, are two neat illustrations of this specific take on agency (see also Glaser 2017). In short, while the question of "who (and what) acts" is central to performative inquiries, it has up to now been less 5.…”

Close Encounters: Intimate service interactions in lap dancing work as a nexus of ‘self-others-things’

“…Developing the in-roads that Merleau Ponty's writing has made into work and organization studies in recent years, and drawing from insights in Butler's writing on performativity, embodiment and liveability, we have emphasized the significance of subjectivities and settings in 'making' organizational worlds. We have shown how lap dancers' embodied subjectivities are brought into being as a material presence (Ford et al, 2017).…”

Critical leadership and set-up-to-fail syndrome

“…While effective leaders are responsible for the failures, they will not be successful but will share with the team. Experts admit that certain qualities can be required for a great leader (Ford et al 2017). They say that true leaders are always ready to develop talents and aspiring leaders.…”