2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Becoming a preferred customer one step at a time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, the Kano model was aimed at capturing the customer satisfaction based on the characteristic performance attributes of a product or service. However, here it is aimed at capturing the supplier satisfaction which can ultimately make a manufacturer a PC over its competitors a concept of reverse marketing (Nollet et al, 2012). Here the purpose of classification is due to the fact that, not every PCE is equally important and capable in contributing for supplier satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Basically, the Kano model was aimed at capturing the customer satisfaction based on the characteristic performance attributes of a product or service. However, here it is aimed at capturing the supplier satisfaction which can ultimately make a manufacturer a PC over its competitors a concept of reverse marketing (Nollet et al, 2012). Here the purpose of classification is due to the fact that, not every PCE is equally important and capable in contributing for supplier satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This refers to the degree to which competent personnel from both the sides pay visits at various stages of value addition process (Routroy, 2008;Hüttinger et al, 2012;Nollet et al, 2012;Ellegaard and Koch, 2012). …”
Section: • Mutual Visits By Competent Personnel (Mcp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the literature this is referred to as "supplier satisfaction" (Baxter, 2012;Benton & Maloni, 2005;Essig & Amann, 2009;Hald, 2012;Hüttinger, et al, 2012;Nollet, Rebolledo & Popel, 2012;Nyaga, Whipple & Lynch, 2010;Schiele, Calvi & Gibbert, 2012;Schiele, Veldman & Hüttinger, 2010;Trent & Zacharia, 2012). Where a demand organisation understands how to distinguish itself from its competitors by better meeting the needs of the supplier than the competitors can, it may become possible to obtain preferential treatment from the supplier, referred to in literature as "preferred customer status" (Baxter, 2012;Ellis, Henke & Kull, 2012;Hüttinger, Schiele & Schröer, 2014;Moody, 1992;Nollet et al, 2012;Schiele, 2012;Schiele et al, 2012;Schiele et al, 2010;Schiele, Veldman & Hüttinger, 2011;Trent & Zacharia, 2012). A supplier can only be satisfied by the performance of their customer and give them preferred customer status after a customer is in the picture, so that positive expectations can be created with the potential supplier.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%