2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Becker expander implants: Truly a long term single stage reconstruction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors such as the reconstruction method, type of prosthesis, and risk factors for wound healing problems such as obesity, smoking, hypertension, and pre‐ or postoperative radiation therapy influence the chance for BR failure . In particular, postoperative radiation therapy in patients with implant BR increases the complication risk when compared with women with autologous BR .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as the reconstruction method, type of prosthesis, and risk factors for wound healing problems such as obesity, smoking, hypertension, and pre‐ or postoperative radiation therapy influence the chance for BR failure . In particular, postoperative radiation therapy in patients with implant BR increases the complication risk when compared with women with autologous BR .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, a recent paper 16 comparing the aesthetic outcome and patient satisfaction between patients who had received the Natrelle 150 implant and Becker 25 implant showed no difference between the 2. 25 This showed an explantation rate of 68% by 5 years. 16 Historically, radiotherapy is associated with poor outcome of breast reconstruction and higher rate of complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In 107 reconstructed breasts with McGhan 150 expander implants, the authors identified grade III or IV capsular contracture in 26% of cases, with a high rate of extrusion due to local metastasis of the disease. Chew et al 21 performed a study of patients indicated for definitive expander implant reconstruction, with a mean fol low-up period of 12.5 years. They indicated that during a 10-year period, only 9.5% of expander implants were not removed.…”
Section: Location Of Definitive Expander Implant N %mentioning
confidence: 99%