2017
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2017.1305451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Because then you could never ever get a job!’: children’s constructions of NAPLAN as high-stakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…‘Students who feel connected, safe and secure are more likely to be active participants in their learning and to achieve better physical, emotional, social and educational outcomes.’ These aspirations however are constrained by the resource limitations, school structures and practices of the ‘real’ space’. Research and media reports increasingly document the significant anxiety experienced by many students confronted by the ‘ideal’ of high performance as measured on single sitting high stakes tests such as NAPLAN (Howell, 2017; Manuel et al, 2018). Additionally wellbeing objectives are not always aligned with the historical and societal beliefs that construct Australian schools as monolingual learning spaces despite the research evidence showing the academic and wellbeing benefits of valuing all of students’ linguistic and cultural resources (Creese & Blackledge, 2015; Duarte, 2019; French, 2016; Rosiers et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Theoretical Frame: the Trialectic Of Spatial Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Students who feel connected, safe and secure are more likely to be active participants in their learning and to achieve better physical, emotional, social and educational outcomes.’ These aspirations however are constrained by the resource limitations, school structures and practices of the ‘real’ space’. Research and media reports increasingly document the significant anxiety experienced by many students confronted by the ‘ideal’ of high performance as measured on single sitting high stakes tests such as NAPLAN (Howell, 2017; Manuel et al, 2018). Additionally wellbeing objectives are not always aligned with the historical and societal beliefs that construct Australian schools as monolingual learning spaces despite the research evidence showing the academic and wellbeing benefits of valuing all of students’ linguistic and cultural resources (Creese & Blackledge, 2015; Duarte, 2019; French, 2016; Rosiers et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Theoretical Frame: the Trialectic Of Spatial Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other Australian research with teachers finds that they identify NAPLAN as having a negative impact on student wellbeing (Cummings et al, 2018), with reports of increased student anxiety and stress, or even crying (Thompson, 2013;Rice, Dulfer, Polesel & O'Hanlon, 2015). Howell's (2017) research with primary school students in Australia found that NAPLAN tests were construed as high stakes by students and associated with negative emotional responses such as anxiety, even though the policy intention is that such tests are low stakes for students. Cummings et al (2018) found that around one third of students reported feeling worried or sad before and during NAPLAN testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings suggest children in low SES public schools frequently reported negative emotions regarding NAPLAN, drawing faces that showed fear, anxiety and sadness (Swain et al, 2018). In contrast, independent Catholic schools found more variation in children's responses to NAPLAN with negative responses mainly related to its unclear purpose and expressed as frustration, anger and boredom (Howell, 2017). Howell also found Year 7 students had more negative attitudes towards NAPLAN than younger cohorts, concerned it would affect their progression through school and into higher education.…”
Section: Student Attitudes and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Some studies have specifically examined the effect of NAPLAN on student wellbeing (Howell, 2017;Lingard et al, 2016;Swain et al, 2018). Findings suggest children in low SES public schools frequently reported negative emotions regarding NAPLAN, drawing faces that showed fear, anxiety and sadness (Swain et al, 2018).…”
Section: Student Attitudes and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%