2014
DOI: 10.1111/eff.12150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beaver dams shift desert fish assemblages toward dominance by non‐native species (Verde River, Arizona, USA)

Abstract: The reintroduction of beaver (Castor canadensis) into arid and semi-arid rivers is receiving increasing management and conservation attention in recent years, yet very little is known about native versus non-native fish occupancy in beaver pond habitats. Streams of the American Southwest support a highly endemic, highly endangered native fish fauna and abundant non-native fishes, and here we investigated the hypothesis that beaver ponds in this region may lead to fish assemblages dominated by non-native specie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(180 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, only the green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus benefitted from the anomalous droughts that were negatively associated with native abundances, and no non‐natives were reduced in abundance by the floods that were positively associated with native abundance. Whereas the positive response of green sunfish to anomalous droughts is in agreement with its high preference for slow current conditions and lacustrine habitats (Frimpong & Angermeier, ; Gibson et al ., ; Pool & Olden, ), non‐natives not responding to anomalous floods is a more intriguing outcome. We offer two explanations for the observed lack of response by non‐natives: (i) catastrophic floods (4 events during the studied period and 6 preceding it) were perhaps not intense enough to influence the non‐native assemblage; or (ii) non‐natives indeed responded (negatively) to flow variation on the short‐term but recolonized quickly, so that analyses of long‐term trajectories would not reflect such responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, only the green sunfish Lepomis cyanellus benefitted from the anomalous droughts that were negatively associated with native abundances, and no non‐natives were reduced in abundance by the floods that were positively associated with native abundance. Whereas the positive response of green sunfish to anomalous droughts is in agreement with its high preference for slow current conditions and lacustrine habitats (Frimpong & Angermeier, ; Gibson et al ., ; Pool & Olden, ), non‐natives not responding to anomalous floods is a more intriguing outcome. We offer two explanations for the observed lack of response by non‐natives: (i) catastrophic floods (4 events during the studied period and 6 preceding it) were perhaps not intense enough to influence the non‐native assemblage; or (ii) non‐natives indeed responded (negatively) to flow variation on the short‐term but recolonized quickly, so that analyses of long‐term trajectories would not reflect such responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined the seven most common fish species in the upper Verde River, collectively representing, on average, 87% of stream reach biomass (Gibson et al. ). Native fishes included desert sucker ( Catostomus clarki ), Sonora sucker ( Catosotmus insignis ), and roundtail chub ( Gila robusta ); species that are endemic to the Colorado River Basin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In May-June 2012, fish communities were sampled in 25 stream sites in the upper Verde watershed (Figure 1; Gibson, Olden, & O'Neill, 2015). At each designated site, a~100 m reach with 1-2 pool-riffle-run sequences was enclosed with block nets, and the fish community was surveyed using 2-pass depletion backpack electrofishing.…”
Section: Fish Community Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suites of candidate models were specified that included either F I G U R E 1 Locations of fish community sampling efforts (Gibson et al, 2015; grey circles) and per capita nutrient recycling measurements (this study; black crosses) in streams of the upper Verde River watershed in central Arizona, USA no random effects (i.e. Suites of candidate models were specified that included either F I G U R E 1 Locations of fish community sampling efforts (Gibson et al, 2015; grey circles) and per capita nutrient recycling measurements (this study; black crosses) in streams of the upper Verde River watershed in central Arizona, USA no random effects (i.e.…”
Section: Modelling Per Capita Recycling Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%