Beautiful Contradictions: News Pictures and Modern Magazines

Mendelson, Jordana

doi:10.4324/9781003103547-40

Getting the Picture 2020

DOI: 10.4324/9781003103547-40

|View full text |Cite

Beautiful Contradictions: News Pictures and Modern Magazines

Jordana Mendelson¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Jordana Mendelson has written how magazines during wartime gain an unexpected poignancy, becoming 'platforms for the exhibition of war and commerce, photograph as testimony and fantasy'. 35 This doubling of documentary with unreality, a key aspect of the disjuncture produced by Fashion is indestructible, was pervasive throughout Vogue, where fashion photographs were placed alongside advertisements (both for clothing and other domestic items) and sketches and drawings danced around the main body of text. Part of the fantasy was that while images of destroyed buildings multiplied throughout the British press, photographs of dead civilians were censored.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Back of Her Head: The Fashionable Wartime Ruins of Cecil Beaton

Brandon‐Salmon¹

2022

Art History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is she looking at? The woman in the black-and-white photograph (plate 1) pauses, as if in mid-step. Her head is turned away from us as she faces the devastation: smashed wooden beams, exposed brickwork, and lying before her, a piece of fallen masonry. She isn't caught in motion, but has come to a halt, right leg slightly lifted in indecision. She has a briefcase under her arm and black gloves on. Her suit is smartly cut, shoulders emphasized. The dark mass of the back of her head in the centre of the image fails to resolve into revelation, refusing to cue the viewer as to how to react to the destruction, leaving us to ponder her thoughts. It presents an aporia for the viewer to fall into.The photograph in its original context offers a powerful interpretative setting: published in the September 1941 issue of British Vogue, the image is placed above bold italics, inscribed with the legend Fashion is indestructible. In smaller type, beneath the photograph, is written: 'Her poise unshaken, she reads about the other fire of London in which the earlier Temple was destroyed.' The viewer is guided towards what the woman is experiencing, taking stock of the ruined Middle Temple, one of the Inns of Court in central London. Besides the caption are the credits: 'Digby Morton suit; Cecil Beaton photograph'. The model, Elizabeth Cowell, is left unidentified, as was frequently the case with fashion images in Vogue. 1 It is not an accidental photograph, but an image of couture.Beaton's photograph shows the damage which the Temple had endured after being bombed on Saturday 10 May 1941 (plate 2), the barristers' chambers above Christopher Wren's cloisters devastated. Cowell stands in Church Court, the unseen Temple Church just to her right, while she looks across the rubble to Pump Court on the other side. Wren had designed the cloisters after the 1679 fire, allowing one to walk between Middle Temple Lane and King's Bench Walk, the two main north-south thoroughfares in the Temple. 2 The claim that Fashion is indestructible positions this as a propaganda image, arguing that high fashion -as an idea and an ideal -can survive the Blitz, even when London is nightly being destroyed. We might be tempted to read it as embodying the 'keep calm and carry on' ethos, yet the clashing registers, where wartime destruction is used to advertise clothing, seem grossly inappropriate. Is there a hint of 'trauma tourism' at play here; the model as Beaton's avatar, seeking out the most aesthetic examples of bomb damage? 3 At first glance, this is a propaganda image; at second glance, a bad taste joke.Yet it is a more complex image than its ideological surface implies. It invokes intersecting temporalities (of fashion, people, and buildings). As I argue below, the

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Back of Her Head: The Fashionable Wartime Ruins of Cecil Beaton

Brandon‐Salmon¹

2022

Art History

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Beautiful Contradictions: News Pictures and Modern Magazines

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The Back of Her Head: The Fashionable Wartime Ruins of Cecil Beaton

The Back of Her Head: The Fashionable Wartime Ruins of Cecil Beaton

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About