2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2021)133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beautiful and charming chromodipole moments

Abstract: In the context of the Standard Model effective field theory we derive direct and indirect bounds on chromodipole operators involving the bottom and charm quark. We find that the experimental upper limit on the neutron electric dipole moment puts severe constraints on the imaginary parts of the Wilson coefficients of both chromodipole operators. The magnitudes of the Wilson coefficients are instead only weakly constrained by dijet searches and Z-boson production in association with bottom-quark jets. Flavour ph… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies of the electron and/or neutron EDMs in SUSY models [15][16][17][18], in Composite Higgs models [19][20][21], in Leptoquark models [22][23][24][25], in complex two-Higgs and three-Higgs doublet models [26][27][28][29][30] and in scotogenic models [31]. On the model independent side, [32] provides an analysis of the electron EDM including some contributions that arise at two-loop and at dimension-8 level, while [33] studies the neutron EDM in presence of an effective CP violating Higgs-gluon interaction encoded by a dimension-6 SMEFT operator and [34] analyzes the contribution to the neutron EDM induced by chromo-dipoles of second and third generation quarks. Other studies of EDMs in presence of dimension-six interactions involving the Higgs boson and fermion fields are performed in [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies of the electron and/or neutron EDMs in SUSY models [15][16][17][18], in Composite Higgs models [19][20][21], in Leptoquark models [22][23][24][25], in complex two-Higgs and three-Higgs doublet models [26][27][28][29][30] and in scotogenic models [31]. On the model independent side, [32] provides an analysis of the electron EDM including some contributions that arise at two-loop and at dimension-8 level, while [33] studies the neutron EDM in presence of an effective CP violating Higgs-gluon interaction encoded by a dimension-6 SMEFT operator and [34] analyzes the contribution to the neutron EDM induced by chromo-dipoles of second and third generation quarks. Other studies of EDMs in presence of dimension-six interactions involving the Higgs boson and fermion fields are performed in [35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at 95% CL, which has been obtained in [34] from an analysis of the transverse momentum (p T ) spectrum of Z-boson production in association with b-jets as measured by ATLAS in LHC Run II [60]. We add that the nominal strongest bound on c bG has been derived in [34] and relies on high-mass b-jet pair production ATLAS data [61]. While this search imposes c bG ∈ [−149, 149] it is not clear to which extent a SMEFT treatment is trustworthy in this high-mass region, so that we do not use it here.…”
Section: Phenomenological Analysismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…at 95% CL, which has been obtained in [34] from an analysis of the transverse momentum (p T ) spectrum of Z-boson production in association with b-jets as measured by ATLAS in LHC Run II [60]. We add that the nominal strongest bound on c bG has been derived in [34] and relies on high-mass b-jet pair production ATLAS data [61].…”
Section: Phenomenological Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indirect limits on the charm and bottom quark EDMs were previously considered in [31] and the CEDM case was also analyzed in [32]. There the authors derived limits based on the constraints on the heavy quark CEDMs.…”
Section: Jhep07(2022)106mentioning
confidence: 99%